Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

Microplastics in coastal urban sediments: Discrepancies in concentration and character revealed by different approaches to sample processing

The Science of The Total Environment 2022 13 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 35 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.

Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner James Keene, James Keene, Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner James Keene, James Keene, Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Andrew Turner

Summary

Researchers compared two microplastic extraction methods on intertidal sediment samples from three coastal sites near Plymouth, England, finding that direct counting under a stereo microscope yielded higher concentrations (0.58-0.79 MPs/g) than the ZnCl2 flotation-filtration method (0.18-0.48 MPs/g), highlighting methodological discrepancies that complicate cross-study comparisons.

Study Type Environmental

Intertidal, silty sediment samples have been collected from three coastal locations with different uses and anthropogenic signatures in the vicinity of Plymouth, southwest England, and analysed for microplastics (MPs) by two independent means. Firstly, MPs were counted and characterised directly on unprocessed dried sediment under a stereo microscope, and secondly MPs were isolated from sediment by flotation in ZnCl<sub>2</sub> solution and filtration before analysis. Direct counting resulted in average (± one standard deviation) numbers of MPs per g of dry sediment of 0.77 ± 0.16 at a marina-harbour, 0.58 ± 0.30 under a busy road bridge and 0.79 ± 0.43 adjacent to country parkland. After flotation and filtration, concentrations were reduced to 0.24 ± 0.11, 0.18 ± 0.06 and 0.48 ± 0.38 MP g<sup>-1</sup>, respectively. Observations were attributed to hetero-aggregation of small fibres with settling sediment during flotation, and the presence of MPs (including paints) that were too dense to float or that had aggregated or agglomerated with denser sediment and construction material in situ. The findings have implications for the efficacy of flotation procedures, accurate estimations of MP concentrations in sediment and the representativeness of MPs by type, and inter-site comparisons of MPs that are widely reported in the literature.

Read via DOI PubMed Download PDF

Share this paper

Post Share Share Pin Email