We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Microplastics in coastal urban sediments: Discrepancies in concentration and character revealed by different approaches to sample processing
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared two microplastic extraction methods on intertidal sediment samples from three coastal sites near Plymouth, England, finding that direct counting under a stereo microscope yielded higher concentrations (0.58-0.79 MPs/g) than the ZnCl2 flotation-filtration method (0.18-0.48 MPs/g), highlighting methodological discrepancies that complicate cross-study comparisons.
Intertidal, silty sediment samples have been collected from three coastal locations with different uses and anthropogenic signatures in the vicinity of Plymouth, southwest England, and analysed for microplastics (MPs) by two independent means. Firstly, MPs were counted and characterised directly on unprocessed dried sediment under a stereo microscope, and secondly MPs were isolated from sediment by flotation in ZnCl2 solution and filtration before analysis. Direct counting resulted in average (± one standard deviation) numbers of MPs per g of dry sediment of 0.77 ± 0.16 at a marina-harbour, 0.58 ± 0.30 under a busy road bridge and 0.79 ± 0.43 adjacent to country parkland. After flotation and filtration, concentrations were reduced to 0.24 ± 0.11, 0.18 ± 0.06 and 0.48 ± 0.38 MP g-1, respectively. Observations were attributed to hetero-aggregation of small fibres with settling sediment during flotation, and the presence of MPs (including paints) that were too dense to float or that had aggregated or agglomerated with denser sediment and construction material in situ. The findings have implications for the efficacy of flotation procedures, accurate estimations of MP concentrations in sediment and the representativeness of MPs by type, and inter-site comparisons of MPs that are widely reported in the literature.
More Papers Like This
Development of cost-effective methods for sediment extraction – a comparison of two known methods
AI summary Read the abstract
Two commonly used methods for extracting microplastics from sediment samples were compared in an urban Norwegian fjord, finding that method choice significantly affects measured microplastic concentrations. Standardized, cost-effective extraction methods are urgently needed to make microplastic data comparable across studies and locations. The study provides practical guidance for laboratories working to improve consistency in environmental microplastic monitoring.
Are we underestimating floating microplastic pollution? A quantitative analysis of two sampling methodologies
AI summary Read the abstract
A quantitative analysis of 67 microplastic studies compared bulk water sampling with trawl-based methods, finding substantial differences in reported concentrations depending on the technique used. The study warns that inconsistent sampling methodology leads to underestimates of microplastic pollution and hinders cross-study comparisons.
Comparison of microplastic isolation and extraction procedures from marine sediments
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared five methods for extracting microplastics (40-710 μm) from marine sediments by spiking known MP quantities into sediment matrices and measuring percent recovery across extraction approaches. Results showed that sediment matrix composition, MP properties including size and polymer type, and extraction method all significantly influenced recovery efficiency, underscoring the need for standardized extraction protocols to enable cross-study comparisons.
Comparision protocols for extraction of microplastics in water samples
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared four different extraction protocols for isolating microplastics from water samples and found significant differences in efficiency and accuracy across methods. Standardized extraction protocols are critical for producing comparable microplastic abundance data across studies. Without consistent methodology, it is difficult to build a reliable global picture of microplastic contamination levels in water.
Comparative study of three sampling methods for microplastics analysis in seawater
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared three microplastic sampling methods for seawater — direct 0.45 µm filtration, 20 µm pre-concentration followed by 0.45 µm filtration, and Manta trawl with 150 µm mesh — finding orders-of-magnitude differences in reported abundance across methods, underscoring the critical need for standardized protocols.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.