We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Is Wild Marine Biota Affected by Microplastics?
Summary
This review analyzed research on the effects of microplastics on wild marine organisms and found that out of 395 articles identified, only 22 presented data on effects in wild species, with just 12 documenting negative impacts. Researchers found that effects observed in wild organisms were generally less severe than those seen under laboratory conditions. The study highlights a significant gap between experimental findings and what is observed in natural marine environments.
The present review provides detailed information on the adverse effects of MPs on wild marine organisms, including tissue damage, fish condition, oxidative stress, immune toxicity, and genotoxicity. A bibliometric analysis was carried out on CiteSpace (version 6.1.R3) (Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA) to verify how many papers studied the effects on wild marine species. The results showed a total of 395 articles, but only 22 really presented data on the effects or impacts on marine biota, and of these, only 12 articles highlighted negative effects. This review shows that the observed effects in wild organisms were less severe and milder than those found in the experimental conditions. The knowledge of negative effects caused by direct ingestion of microplastics in wild animals is still limited; more efforts are necessary to fully understand the role of MPs and the adverse effects on wild marine organisms, the ecosystem, and human health.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Microplastics in the marine environment - A threat to marine biota?
This review examines the sources, quantities, and effects of microplastics in marine environments to assess whether they pose a genuine threat to marine life. Microplastics are found everywhere from Arctic to Antarctic waters, with the smallest fragments being the most concerning because they are available to a wider range of organisms and have more surface area to carry toxic chemicals.
Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future?
This review critically evaluates published research on microplastic effects on aquatic organisms and identifies significant gaps between laboratory experiments and real-world conditions. Researchers found that most studies use polystyrene spheres at concentrations far higher than those found in the environment, while the most common microplastics in nature are fragments and fibers of other polymer types. The study calls for more environmentally realistic experimental designs to better understand the actual ecological risks of microplastic pollution.
Linking effects of microplastics to ecological impacts in marine environments
This review examines how laboratory-scale findings on microplastic toxicity can be connected to ecological-level impacts in marine environments. Researchers highlight that microplastics affect marine organisms through ingestion, chemical leaching, and by serving as vectors for pathogens and invasive species. The study emphasizes the need for more ecologically realistic experiments to bridge the gap between controlled laboratory studies and real-world environmental conditions.
Feasting on microplastics: ingestion by and effects on marine organisms
This review synthesizes experimental studies on microplastic ingestion and effects across a wide range of marine organisms, finding evidence of physical harm, reproductive effects, and reduced feeding in multiple taxa. The paper provides a comprehensive overview of the biological consequences of microplastic ingestion and identifies key knowledge gaps for future research.
Microplastics Not Shown to Affect Coral Health in the Field Like in Laboratory Studies
Researchers examined the relationship between microplastic concentrations and coral health indicators in field settings globally, using data from two databases filtered to observations within 0.2 degrees of coral reef locations. They found that field studies did not replicate the negative effects on coral health observed in controlled laboratory experiments, suggesting that the simplified conditions of laboratory studies may not accurately represent the complexity of natural reef environments.