0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Food & Water Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Nanoplastics Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Insights into the Adverse Effects of Bisphenol A on the Environment and Human Health

2023 Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Krishnendu Adhikary, Riya Sarkar, Sriya Choudhury, Sankha Chakrabortty, Prithviraj Karak

Summary

Researchers investigated the toxicity of bisphenol A (BPA), its replacement bisphenol F (BPF), and their combination on primary producers, finding that both compounds harm eukaryotic green algae and raising concerns about the safety of BPA substitutes.

Study Type In vivo

Plastic, an integral part of our daily lives, is present in various items such as carry bags, packaging materials, and medical supplies like syringes. Despite contributing to scientific advancements, the non-biodegradable nature of certain plastic polymers poses environmental concerns. Bisphenol A (BPA), widely used in plastic manufacturing, has been banned due to its harmful impact on both the environment and human health. Its replacement, bisphenol F (BPF), is now employed. This study investigates the toxicity of BPA, BPF, and their combination on primary producers, specifically eukaryotic green algae. The escalating global plastic consumption, compounded by the persistent presence of BPA in aquatic environments, necessitates attention to prevent plastic pollution from affecting future generations. Plastic and nanoplastic materials are pervasive in soil and the environment, posing health risks to humans through air, water, and soil pathways. Plastic particles enter the food chain via small fish in lakes and seas. Crucially, interactions between BPA and natural substances or environmental stressors can yield both positive and negative effects, as evidenced by in vitro and in vivo studies. It is imperative to consider these interactions when assessing BPA exposures and their health implications, as they significantly influence endpoint measurements and cellular responses. This article emphasizes the adverse effects of plastic pollution on the environment and human health, while also exploring emerging remedies to mitigate BPA’s impact.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Single and multispecies microalgae toxicological tests assessing the impact of several BPA analogues used by industry

Researchers tested five BPA chemical analogues (intended as safer BPA replacements) on three marine microalgae species, finding that several analogues — particularly BPFL and BPAF — were more toxic than BPA itself and that results from single-species tests did not reliably predict community-level outcomes, raising concerns about the safety of current BPA substitutes.

Article Tier 2

Toxicity of bisphenol A and its structural congeners to microalgae Chlorella vulgaris and Desmodesmus armatus

Researchers examined the toxicity of bisphenol A and six structural congeners on two microalgae species, finding varying levels of growth inhibition and highlighting that some BPA alternatives may pose comparable or greater risks to aquatic primary producers.

Article Tier 2

Can BPA Analogs Affect Cellular and Biochemical Responses in the Microalga Phaeodactylum tricornutum Bohlin?

This study tested three bisphenol A replacement chemicals (BPAF, BPF, and BPS) on a marine diatom at environmentally relevant concentrations, finding that all three disrupted algal growth and triggered oxidative stress. Although no actual cell damage was detected at these doses, the results suggest that BPA substitutes are not chemically inert and may still threaten marine primary producers. This is relevant to microplastics research because these bisphenol chemicals leach from plastics and are released alongside microplastic particles in the environment.

Article Tier 2

Can BPA Analogs Affect Cellular and Biochemical Responses in the Microalga Phaeodactylum tricornutum Bohlin?

Researchers tested three bisphenol A analogs (BPAF, BPF, BPS) and their mixture on the marine diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum at environmentally relevant concentrations of 300 ng/L, measuring growth, cell size, and oxidative stress biomarkers. All three analogs and their mixture affected the microalga, raising concerns about the ecological risks of BPA substitutes in marine environments.

Article Tier 2

Bisphenol Analogs in Aquatic Environments and Their Effects on Marine Species—A Review

This review summarized concentrations of bisphenol A analogs found across aquatic environments globally and assessed their toxic effects on marine species, finding that many BPA substitutes show similar endocrine-disrupting, oxidative, and genotoxic activity to the compound they replaced. The findings raise concerns that current BPA alternatives may not represent a meaningful safety improvement for aquatic ecosystems.

Share this paper