We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Could spatial variation be more important than species identity in determining the presence of microplastics in temperate sponges?
Summary
A study of microplastic contamination in temperate sponges found that the sampling location was a stronger predictor of microplastic presence than the sponge species, suggesting that local environmental conditions drive exposure more than species biology.
Microplastic (MP) particles (<5000 µm) pose a risk to many marine organisms. Globally, sponges are important suspension-feeding organisms that may be particularly vulnerable to MPs since many of these particles fall within their food size range. However, there has been little research on spatial variation in MP abundance in sponges. Here we examined MP abundance and spatial variation in sponges from Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ). We aimed to confirm the presence of potential microplastics (PMPs) in samples from 45 sponge samples across six species and three sites in the Wellington Harbour. Samples were digested with bleach, filtered, and analysed using fluorescent microscopy to quantify and measure PMPs. PMPs were present in every sponge sample with abundances between 207 ± 131 and 1893 ± 396 PMP particles g-1 (dry sponge weight). There were significant differences in PMP abundance between sites and between some species, but most of the variation was explained by site (40–53% vs. 4–24% of the variance). Our results suggest that PMP abundance in sponges is mainly explained by spatial variation in microplastic abundance rather than species identity.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Could spatial variation be more important than species identity in determining the presence of microplastics in temperate sponges?
Researchers found microplastics present in every sponge sample across six species and three sites in Wellington Harbour, New Zealand, and determined that spatial location explained 40–53% of the variation in microplastic abundance compared to only 4–24% explained by species identity, highlighting site-level pollution as the dominant driver.
Microplastic distribution in urban vs pristine mangroves: Using marine sponges as bioindicators of environmental pollution
Researchers collected marine sponges from urban and pristine mangrove environments and measured microplastic content, finding significantly higher MP loads in urban sponges and demonstrating that sessile benthic sponges can serve as effective bioindicators of coastal microplastic pollution.
Plastics in Porifera: The occurrence of potential microplastics in marine sponges and seawater from Bocas del Toro, Panamá
Researchers found potential microplastics in the tissues of six Caribbean sponge species from Bocas del Toro, Panama, with concentrations ranging from 6 to 169 particles per gram of dry tissue and an average of 107 particles per liter in surrounding seawater.
Environmental exposure more than plastic composition shapes marine microplastic‐associated bacterial communities in Pacific versus Caribbean field incubations
Researchers incubated six types of household plastic polymers in Pacific and Caribbean coastal waters to study the bacterial communities that form on microplastics. They found that geographic location and exposure time were far more important than plastic type in shaping these microbial communities. The study identified a core plastisphere of 57 bacterial variants common across all conditions, suggesting environmental context plays a bigger role than plastic composition in microplastic colonization.
Sponges as bioindicators for microparticulate pollutants?
This study investigated whether sponges can serve as bioindicators of microparticle pollution in coral reef environments, finding that sponges incorporate foreign particles including microplastics from the surrounding water. Sponges could be useful sentinel organisms for monitoring microplastic contamination in reef ecosystems given their extensive filter feeding.