We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Raw data related to publication "Microplastics could be marginally more hazardous than natural suspended solids –a meta-analysis"
Summary
This meta-analysis provides raw data supporting a study comparing microplastic toxicity to natural suspended solids in water. The findings suggest that microplastics may be only marginally more harmful than natural particles, which is important context for understanding the actual health risks microplastics pose compared to other particles we routinely encounter.
Supplementary data table 1 contains collated toxicity data for microplastics and suspended solids. The R-code for all analyses which are based on data table 1 is also provided. Data and R-code are related to publication:Microplastics could be marginally more hazardous than natural suspended solids –a meta-analysisM. Ogonowski1*, M. Wagner2, B. Rogell1, M. Haave3,4, A. Lusher5,61 Department of Aquatic Resources, Institute of Freshwater Research, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Stångholmsvägen 2, SE-17893, Drottningholm, Sweden2 Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Høgskoleringen 5, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway3 NORCE, Norwegian Research Centre AS, Climate & Environment, Nygårdsporten 112, NO-5008 Bergen, Norway4 Department of Chemistry, University of Bergen, NO-5020 Bergen, Norway5 Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA), Gaustadalléen 21, NO-0349 Oslo, Norway6 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Bergen, NO-5020 Bergen, Norway*Corresponding author: martin.ogonowski@slu.se
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
What is particular about microplastics? A meta-analysis of the toxicity of microplastics and suspended sediments
This meta-analysis pools data from multiple studies to compare the toxicity of microplastics with natural suspended sediment particles in aquatic environments. The results help determine whether microplastics are uniquely harmful or behave similarly to other particles that organisms naturally encounter. This distinction matters for setting science-based pollution limits and understanding actual health risks.
Microplastics could be marginally more hazardous than natural suspended solids – A meta-analysis
Species sensitivity distributions constructed from harmonized toxicity data suggest microplastics may be marginally more hazardous to aquatic organisms than natural suspended sediments, though high uncertainty prevents definitive conclusions. The lack of comparable experimental studies and dose-dependent data was a major limitation.
Microplastic exposure in aquatic invertebrates can cause significant negative effects compared to natural particles - A meta-analysis.
This meta-analysis pools data from 26 studies comparing the effects of microplastics versus natural particles on aquatic animals. The findings show that microplastics cause more harm to growth, reproduction, and survival than natural particles in some species, suggesting that the chemical composition of plastics, not just the physical presence of particles, contributes to their toxicity.
Algal growth at environmentally relevant concentrations of suspended solids: implications for microplastic hazard assessment
This study tested whether microplastic particles inhibit algae growth compared to natural sediment particles at environmentally relevant concentrations, finding that turbidity from any suspended solids — not just plastic — affects algae. The finding highlights the need to use appropriate reference materials when assessing microplastic toxicity.
Understanding hazardous concentrations of microplastics in fresh water using non-traditional toxicity data
Researchers developed hazard concentration thresholds for microplastics in freshwater using non-traditional toxicity data, accounting for environmentally relevant sizes, shapes, and polymer types to provide more realistic governance standards.