0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Human Health Effects Sign in to save

Identification of Microplastics and Non-Microplastics Released from Masks under Environmental Conditions

E3S Web of Conferences 2023 Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Minglu Ma, Minglu Ma, Minglu Ma, Minglu Ma, Minglu Ma, Minglu Ma, Minglu Ma, Dongfang Xu Dongfang Xu Dongfang Xu, Dongfang Xu, Minglu Ma, Minglu Ma, Dongfang Xu, Minglu Ma, Dongfang Xu Dongfang Xu Minglu Ma, Dongfang Xu, Minglu Ma, Minglu Ma, Dongfang Xu, Dongfang Xu

Summary

Researchers found that single-use surgical masks worn during the COVID-19 pandemic release microplastics under environmental stress, with UV exposure generating the most particles (approximately 120 items per mask), followed by mechanical abrasion and high-temperature exposure.

Polymers

Single-use plastic masks had been widely used in the background of COVID-19, which became the potential source of microplastics. This study focused on the release and characterization of microplastics and non-plastic microparticles from single-use surgical masks (SMs) under simulated environmental conditions. In this work, we found that most microplastics were released from SMs under UV exposure (120.00 ± 17.44 items/mask). Mechanical abrasion (76.00 ± 22.63 items/mask) and high temperature exposure (68.00 ± 0.00 items/mask) could also significantly promote the release of microplastics contrasted to the control groups (37.33 ± 8.33 items/mask). The main polymer types of microplastics were PP and PET. In addition, the total particles were released from masks as the order of mechanical abrasion (17.42 ± 2.25 × 103 items/mask) > UV exposure (5.12 ± 1.62 × 10 3 items/mask) > high temperature exposure (4.57 ± 3.47 × 103 items/mask) > control groups (2.83 ± 1.46 × 10 3 items/mask). Among them, there were varied and complex non-microplastics particles (22 kinds total) detected in the experiments. This study provides help to better understand the potential risk of microplastics and different component types of non-plastic microparticles released from masks under simulated environmental conditions.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper