0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Nanoplastics Sign in to save

Origin, exposure routes and xenobiotics impart nanoplastics with toxic effects on freshwater bivalves

Environmental Science Nano 2023 11 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 50 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Adeline Arini, Adeline Arini, Adeline Arini, Adeline Arini, Magalie Baudrimont Adeline Arini, Magalie Baudrimont Adeline Arini, Étienne Grau, Sandra Muller, Sandra Muller, Sandra Muller, Magalie Baudrimont Sandra Muller, Magalie Baudrimont Adeline Arini, Véronique Coma, Véronique Coma, Magalie Baudrimont Magalie Baudrimont Étienne Grau, Étienne Grau, Magalie Baudrimont Magalie Baudrimont Olivier Sandre, Magalie Baudrimont Olivier Sandre, Magalie Baudrimont Magalie Baudrimont Magalie Baudrimont Magalie Baudrimont Magalie Baudrimont Magalie Baudrimont Magalie Baudrimont Magalie Baudrimont Magalie Baudrimont Magalie Baudrimont Magalie Baudrimont Étienne Grau, Magalie Baudrimont Magalie Baudrimont Magalie Baudrimont

Summary

Researchers found that nanoplastics collected from a natural river caused more gene expression disruption in freshwater bivalves than pristine polystyrene nanoplastics, with neurotoxic effects and synergistic interactions with aluminum that persisted even after depuration.

Body Systems
Study Type Environmental

Gene expression was more disrupted in the case of diet-borne exposure of bivalves to NP-L (from the Leyre River) compared to NP-PS, accompanied by neurotoxic effects, synergistic effects with aluminium, and this, even after 7 days of depuration.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper