We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Life cycle assessment (LCA) on waste management options for derelict fishing gear
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers used life cycle assessment to compare four waste management options for derelict fishing gear retrieved from the ocean, including mechanical recycling, syngas production, energy recovery, and landfill disposal. They found that mechanical recycling and energy recovery had the lowest environmental impacts, while syngas production and landfilling were not competitive due to high energy requirements or insufficient offset credits. The study provides guidance for establishing environmentally sound waste management systems for this growing marine litter waste stream.
Abstract Purpose Derelict fishing gear (DFG) is one of the most abundant and harmful types of marine litter that gets increasingly retrieved from the ocean. However, for this novel waste stream recycling and recovery pathways are not yet commonly established. To identify the most suitable waste management system, this study assesses the potential environmental impacts of DFG waste treatment options in Europe. Methods This study applies an attributional life cycle assessment (LCA) to four DFG waste treatment scenarios, namely a mechanical recycling, syngas production, energy recovery and landfill disposal. The scope spans from the retrieval and transport processes to pre- and end-treatment steps until the outputs are sent to landfill or assumed to substitute products or energy. Primary data was collected from retrieval and waste treatment trials in Europe. Contribution, sensitivity and uncertainty analyses were conducted using the LCA software SimaPro and ReCiPe as the impact methodology. Results and discussion The results show that the mechanical recycling and energy recovery achieve the lowest potential environmental impacts. The syngas production and landfill disposal scenario are not environmentally competitive because they require too much electricity, or their avoided production credits were too small to offset their emissions. Unlike the pre-treatment and transport processes, the retrieval and end-treatment processes have a significant impact on the overall results. The transport distances, energy mix and market and technological assumptions are least sensitive, while changes to the waste composition significantly affect the results. Especially a reduced lead content benefits the human toxicity impact potential of the landfill disposal scenario. The uncertainty analysis showed that the results are very robust in nine of twelve impact categories. Conclusions This is the first LCA study that compares waste treatment options for marine litter. The results indicate that a disposal of DFG is hazardous and should be replaced with mechanical recycling or energy recovery. While this may be technologically possible and environmentally beneficial, economic and social factors should also be considered before a final decision is made. To further reduce environmental impacts, marine litter prevention should play a more important role. Graphical abstract
More Papers Like This
Regional management options for floating marine litter in coastal waters from a life cycle assessment perspective
AI summary Read the abstract
A life cycle assessment evaluated regional management options for floating marine litter in coastal waters, comparing collection, prevention, and disposal strategies to identify the most environmentally favorable approaches for marine litter governance.
Fishing net waste management: quantification and valorization
AI summary Read the abstract
Abandoned and discarded fishing nets are a major source of microplastics in the ocean because they are made of synthetic fibers that slowly fragment over time. This study quantified the volume of fishing net waste generated in a Portuguese fishing port and evaluated strategies for diverting it from landfill toward recycling and material recovery. Effective management of fishing gear waste is a practical lever for reducing one of the most persistent sources of marine microplastic pollution.
Quantification and environmental pollution aspects of lost fishing gear in the Nordic countries
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compiled data from Nordic countries on the quantity and composition of abandoned, lost, and discarded fishing gear (ALDFG) in aquatic environments, examining contributions to macro- and microplastic pollution and hazardous chemical contamination, while also evaluating prevention strategies and mitigation options for lost gear impacts.
Comparing the end-of-life circularity potential of commercial fishing gear deployed in Norway by applying multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA)
AI summary Read the abstract
This study applied multi-criteria decision analysis to compare the end-of-life circularity potential of six commercial fishing gear types used in Norway, considering economic and environmental sustainability along with technological feasibility. Purse seines showed the highest circularity potential, while gillnets, longlines, and traps posed the greatest challenges for circular end-of-life management.
Supplementary file 1_Fishing net waste management: quantification and valorization.docx
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers developed a methodology to quantify discarded fishing net waste from Latvia's fishing gear industries and evaluated waste valorisation scenarios including reuse, recycling, and energy recovery using environmental life cycle assessment and environmental damage cost methods. The study frames fishing net waste management within circular economy principles, identifying pathways to reduce microplastic release from abandoned or discarded gear into marine ecosystems.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.