0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Sign in to save

Non-destructive detection of kiwifruit soluble solid content based on hyperspectral and fluorescence spectral imaging

Frontiers in Plant Science 2023 32 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 50 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Xiaoshi Shi, Xiaoshi Shi, Lijia Xu, Xiaoshi Shi, Lijia Xu, Yanjun Chen, Lijia Xu, Lijia Xu, Yong He, Yanjun Chen, Xiaohui Wang, Xiaoshi Shi, Heng Chen, Zuoliang Tang, Yong He, Yanjun Chen, Zuoliang Tang, Xiaoshi Shi, Xiaoshi Shi, Yong He, Ning Yang, Yongpeng Zhao Xinyuan Chen, Yongpeng Zhao Yong He, Yuchao Wang, Yong He, Zhiyong Zou, Ning Yang, Zhilang Kang, Zhilang Kang, Yong He, Zhiyong Zou, Yong He, Peng Huang, Yongpeng Zhao Ning Yang, Yong He, Ning Yang, Yongpeng Zhao Yongpeng Zhao

Summary

Researchers compared hyperspectral and fluorescence spectral imaging techniques for non-destructive prediction of kiwifruit soluble solid content, finding that a fluorescence-based machine learning model achieved the best prediction performance for assessing fruit quality.

The soluble solid content (SSC) is one of the important parameters depicting the quality, maturity and taste of fruits. This study explored hyperspectral imaging (HSI) and fluorescence spectral imaging (FSI) techniques, as well as suitable chemometric techniques to predict the SSC in kiwifruit. 90 kiwifruit samples were divided into 70 calibration sets and 20 prediction sets. The hyperspectral images of samples in the spectral range of 387 nm~1034 nm and the fluorescence spectral images in the spectral range of 400 nm~1000 nm were collected, and their regions of interest were extracted. Six spectral pre-processing techniques were used to pre-process the two spectral data, and the best pre-processing method was selected after comparing it with the predicted results. Then, five primary and three secondary feature extraction algorithms were used to extract feature variables from the pre-processed spectral data. Subsequently, three regression prediction models, i.e., the extreme learning machines (ELM), the partial least squares regression (PLSR) and the particle swarm optimization - least square support vector machine (PSO-LSSVM), were established. The prediction results were analyzed and compared further. MASS-Boss-ELM, based on fluorescence spectral imaging technique, exhibited the best prediction performance for the kiwifruit SSC, with the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>R</mml:mtext> <mml:mi>p</mml:mi> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>R</mml:mtext> <mml:mi>c</mml:mi> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> and RPD of 0.8894, 0.9429 and 2.88, respectively. MASS-Boss-PLSR based on the hyperspectral imaging technique showed a slightly lower prediction performance, with the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>R</mml:mtext> <mml:mi>p</mml:mi> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>R</mml:mtext> <mml:mi>c</mml:mi> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , and RPD of 0.8717, 0.8747, and 2.89, respectively. The outcome presents that the two spectral imaging techniques are suitable for the non-destructive prediction of fruit quality. Among them, the FSI technology illustrates better prediction, providing technical support for the non-destructive detection of intrinsic fruit quality.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper