0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Evaluation and Design of Reusable Takeaway Containers Based on the AHP–FCE Model

Sustainability 2023 21 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 45 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Hu Sun, Qihang Yang, Yueqin Wu

Summary

This study applied an analytic hierarchy process combined with fuzzy comprehensive evaluation to systematically assess and optimize the design of reusable takeaway food containers, identifying durability, cleanliness verification, and user convenience as the highest-priority design requirements.

As a strong and effective alternative to disposable food boxes that cause serious pollution consequences, reusable takeaway containers are promising in terms of environmental protection. However, at present, in the service process of leasing, using, distribution, and recycling, reusable takeaway containers have many problems, such as incomplete cleaning, resulting in unhygienic conditions, repeated use of materials that are not safe enough, food spillage, leakage or theft of customer phone and address information due to exposed takeaway order labels, and wrong containers taken by customers. In addition, there is a lack of objective and comprehensive evaluation methods and systems to guide their design and improvement. In order to solve the current problems of reusable takeaway containers and explore a quantitative approach for evaluation of design solutions from the perspective of users, this paper analyzed user behaviors and needs through user interviews, questionnaires, user journey maps (UJM), and other methods. Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation (FCE) were used to construct an evaluation model for the design of reusable takeaway containers, and it was calculated as a function of the survey dataset. The comprehensive index weight model was established, and the design indicators were sorted to obtain the priority of design elements. Three design schemes were proposed and calculated by combining questionnaire data and the FCE method to obtain the optimal Scheme B. The results showed that the combination of UJM and AHP–FCE method framework was suitable for scheme evaluation and design development, which could provide effective and detailed user evaluation for designers and guide the direction of product improvement.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Analysis of Sustainable Takeaway Packaging Design Strategies Based on AHP

Researchers analyzed sustainable takeaway packaging design strategies in China using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to evaluate and prioritize design approaches addressing plastic waste from the country's rapidly growing food delivery sector. They found that integrating sustainability principles into packaging design required structured weighting of criteria derived from sustainable keyword analysis and expert questionnaire scores.

Article Tier 2

Penentuan Aspek Utama Dalam Mendesain Kemasan Tabaro Dange Khas Luwu Menggunakan Analytical Hierarchy Process (ahp)

This paper describes a design methodology for traditional Luwu food packaging using systematic product design principles, covering aesthetic and functional criteria for tabaro dange packaging; it is not directly related to microplastic research.

Article Tier 2

Design framework for circular and sustainable packaging design

Researchers developed a novel packaging design framework integrating circularity and sustainability (C&S) criteria using literature review, expert brainstorming, and field visits. The framework addresses conflicts between sustainability and functional requirements and provides practical iterative strategies for packaging designers.

Article Tier 2

Trash Talk: WHO Uses Which Reusable Product? User Insights and Design Opportunities for Single-use Alternatives

This multi-country study surveyed use of reusable products as substitutes for single-use plastics, identifying which consumer segments already use reusable alternatives and what design features would make them more broadly adopted.

Review Tier 2

Current state and research directions for disposable versus reusable packaging: A systematic literature review of comparative studies

This systematic review of 91 studies compares disposable and reusable packaging for food, beverages, and e-commerce, finding that sustainability outcomes depend heavily on context and that no single packaging type is universally superior.

Share this paper