0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Food & Water Marine & Wildlife Remediation Sign in to save

The field mulching could improve sustainability of spring maize production on the Loess Plateau

Agricultural Water Management 2023 27 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 45 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Shenqiang Lv, Jia Li, Zeyu Yang, Ting Yang, Huitong Li, Xiaofei Wang, Yi Peng, Yi Peng, Chunju Zhou, Linquan Wang, Ahmed I. Abdo

Summary

This study evaluated field mulching impacts on yield stability, soil water storage, nitrogen budget, and soil total nitrogen in spring maize production on the Loess Plateau over multiple years, finding that plastic film mulching improved productivity but raised concerns about microplastic accumulation and nitrogen cycling disruption.

Despite field mulching has been widely adopted to improve crop productivity, agro-ecosystem sustainability of this technology in arid and semi-arid areas is inconclusive. We examined the response of yield stability, changes in soil water storage (ΔSWS), nitrogen (N) budget, soil total nitrogen (TN) content and soil organic carbon (SOC) content to furrow-ridge tillage and film or straw field mulching practices in a 6-year field experiment of rain-fed spring maize (Zea mays L.) on the Loess Plateau from 2016 to 2021. Five tillage practices included conventional tillage (CT), ridge tillage (RT), flat planting with plastic film mulching (FM), ridge tillage with plastic film mulching on ridge (RTF) and maize straw mulching (SM). Nitrogen application rates were 0 and 225 kg N ha−1. Maize yield and yield sustainability index (SYI) of plastic film mulching increased by 26.8%− 73.4% and 4.4%− 13.9%, respectively, compared with CT, and coefficient of variation (CV) of plastic film mulching declined by 0.7%− 10.7% relative to that of CT. The average ΔSWS of all tillage patterns were positive, and the rainwater use potential was 88.3–96.9%. The N budget in all practices was positive under N applied treatments but negative without N input. Without N application, N consumption was substantially exacerbated by plastic film mulching, whereas it was mitigated to some extent by SM. The TN and SOC contents were maintained under plastic film mulching. Soil TN and SOC contents in SM increased by 27.1–29.8% and 22.3–33.3%, respectively, in tested stage. However, its yield varied substantially, particularly under no N application. Small yield increase and higher CV and lower SYI occurred in RT practice. The SOC declined similar to CT. Overall, there was higher variation of yield in SM practice. The SOC appeared to decline in RT practice. The plastic film mulching was a promising practice to increase and stabilize maize yields, improve the rainfall use potential, increase or maintain the TN and SOC contents in semi-arid regions. However, attention should be paid to the impact of microplastic contamination in future research.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Clinical Trial Tier 1

Optimized Farmland Mulching Improves Rainfed Maize Productivity by Regulating Soil Temperature and Phenology on the Loess Plateau in China

A field experiment on the Loess Plateau found that combining plastic film mulch with straw mulch regulated soil temperature and extended the grain-filling period of rainfed maize, preventing premature senescence and improving yields. The study highlights a trade-off in dryland agriculture: plastic mulch conserves moisture but overheats soil, while novel double-mulching patterns can mitigate the temperature problem while still relying on plastic film.

Article Tier 2

Effects of Mulching on Maize Yield and Evapotranspiration in the Heihe River Basin, Northwest China

This study examined how plastic film mulching affects maize yield and water use in northwest China's Heihe River Basin, finding that mulching increases yields and reduces evaporation. However, widespread plastic mulch use is also a major source of microplastic pollution in agricultural soils.

Article Tier 2

Effects of different mulch materials on the photosynthetic characteristics, yield, and soil water use efficiency of wheat in Loess tableland

Not relevant to microplastics — this agricultural study compares different mulching materials (including plastic film) on wheat yield and water use efficiency in the Loess Plateau of China, with no focus on microplastic pollution from plastic mulch.

Article Tier 2

Consequences of 33 Years of Plastic Film Mulching and Nitrogen Fertilization on Maize Growth and Soil Quality

Researchers found that after 33 years of continuous plastic film mulching, residual microplastics in soil persisted even after mulching stopped, though soil moisture and crop yields were still influenced by the legacy effects of long-term mulch use and nitrogen fertilization.

Article Tier 2

Effect of Plastic Membrane and Geotextile Cloth Mulching on Soil Moisture and Spring Maize Growth in the Loess–Hilly Region of Yan’an, China

Researchers conducted a one-year field monitoring experiment in the loess-hilly region of Yan'an, China, comparing plastic membrane mulching, geotextile cloth mulching, and bare soil on soil moisture and spring maize growth. The study found that plastic membrane and geotextile mulching treatments influenced soil moisture dynamics and crop development differently compared to unprotected soil.

Share this paper