0
Systematic Review ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 1 ? Systematic review or meta-analysis. Synthesizes findings across many studies. Strongest evidence. Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Plastic microfibers as a risk factor for the health of aquatic organisms: A bibliometric and systematic review of plastic pandemic

The Science of The Total Environment 2023 29 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 65 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Gabriel Qualhato, Miguel Oliveira Thiago Lopes Rocha, Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Thiago Lopes Rocha, Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Lucélia Gonçalves Vieira, Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Thiago Lopes Rocha, Thiago Lopes Rocha, Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Thiago Lopes Rocha, Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Gabriel Qualhato, Thiago Lopes Rocha, Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Thiago Lopes Rocha, Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Thiago Lopes Rocha, Thiago Lopes Rocha, Thiago Lopes Rocha, Thiago Lopes Rocha, Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Thiago Lopes Rocha, Thiago Lopes Rocha, Miguel Oliveira Thiago Lopes Rocha, Thiago Lopes Rocha, Thiago Lopes Rocha, Thiago Lopes Rocha, Miguel Oliveira Lucélia Gonçalves Vieira, Thiago Lopes Rocha, Miguel Oliveira Thiago Lopes Rocha, Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Thiago Lopes Rocha, Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Thiago Lopes Rocha, Thiago Lopes Rocha, Thiago Lopes Rocha, Thiago Lopes Rocha, Thiago Lopes Rocha, Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira Miguel Oliveira

Summary

Aquatic organisms exposed to plastic microfibers showed accumulation primarily in the digestive tract and exhibited DNA damage, physiological alterations, digestive damage, and mortality. Fiber toxicity depended on size, shape, chemical composition, and association with other pollutants, with nanofiber effects representing a major knowledge gap.

Body Systems
Study Type Review

Plastic microfibers (PMFs) are emerging pollutants widely distributed in the environment. In the early 2020s, the need for personal protection due to the COVID-19 pandemic led to increased consumption of plastic materials (e.g., facemasks and gloves) and ultimately to increased plastic pollution, especially by PMFs. The PMFs present in the environment may be released in this form (primary particles) or in larger materials, that will release them as a result of environmental conditions. Although a considerable number of studies have been addressing the effects of microplastics, most of them studied round particles, with fewer studies focusing on PMFs. Thus, the current study aimed to summarize and critically discuss the available data concerning the ecotoxicological impact of PMFs on aquatic organisms. Aquatic organisms exposed to PMFs showed accumulation, mainly in the digestive tract, and several toxic effects, such as DNA damage, physiological alterations, digestive damage and even mortality, suggesting that PMFs can pose a risk for the health of aquatic organisms. The PMFs induced toxicity to aquatic invertebrate and vertebrate organisms depends on size, shape, chemical association and composition of fibers. Regarding other size range (nm) of plastic fibers, the literature review highlighted a knowledge gap in terms of the effects of plastic nanofibers on aquatic organisms. There is a knowledge gap in terms of the interaction and modes of action of PMFs associated with other pollutants. In addition, studies addressing effects at different trophic levels as well as the use of other biological models should be considered. Overall, research gaps and recommendations for future research and trends considering the environmental impact of the COVID-19 pandemic are presented.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper