0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Round Robin Test on Microplastic Counting and Identification Method

Environmental sciences 2023 2 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 30 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Raffaella Mossotti Giulia Dalla Fontana, Raffaella Mossotti Giulia Dalla Fontana, Raffaella Mossotti Raffaella Mossotti Raffaella Mossotti Raffaella Mossotti Giulia Dalla Fontana, Anastasia Anceschi, Raffaella Mossotti Giulia Dalla Fontana, Tiziano Battistini, Raffaella Mossotti Giulia Dalla Fontana, Giulia Dalla Fontana, Giulia Dalla Fontana, Raffaella Mossotti Raffaella Mossotti Raffaella Mossotti Raffaella Mossotti Anastasia Anceschi, Giulia Dalla Fontana, Anastasia Anceschi, Giulia Dalla Fontana, Anastasia Anceschi, Anastasia Anceschi, Anastasia Anceschi, Enrico Gasparin, Giulia Dalla Fontana, Giulia Dalla Fontana, Enrico Gasparin, Enrico Gasparin, Enrico Gasparin, Tiziano Battistini, Enrico Gasparin, Enrico Gasparin, Raffaella Mossotti Raffaella Mossotti Raffaella Mossotti Tiziano Battistini, Enrico Gasparin, Tiziano Battistini, Tiziano Battistini, Raffaella Mossotti Raffaella Mossotti Giulia Dalla Fontana, Giulia Dalla Fontana, Giulia Dalla Fontana, Raffaella Mossotti Raffaella Mossotti Raffaella Mossotti Raffaella Mossotti Raffaella Mossotti Raffaella Mossotti Giulia Dalla Fontana, Giulia Dalla Fontana, Giulia Dalla Fontana, Tiziano Battistini, Raffaella Mossotti Giulia Dalla Fontana, Raffaella Mossotti

Summary

This study ran a round robin test across multiple laboratories to evaluate the reliability of a standard protocol for counting and identifying microplastics in water from textile washing. The results assessed how reproducible the method is across different labs, which is essential for generating comparable data on microplastic fiber pollution from laundry.

The aim of this work is to verify the quality, robustness, and accuracy of a standard analytical protocol for the determination of microplastics in aqueous textile matrices. In order to reach this objective, a round robin scale identification and quantification test program was conducted. In particular, this chapter describes the round robin test, an interlaboratory comparison test on standard microfilament suspensions initiated in November 2021 by an expression of interest open call. In total, 18 laboratories expressed their interest, and 13 participants sent their results. Each of these laboratories received a set of 10 samples, accompanied by a protocol. The 10 samples consisted of three replicates per type of three different synthetic yarns and a control sample. The data required were the number of microplastics per sample recognized as fibers or particles, microplastic fiber lengths and diameters, and identification of the polymer using vibrational spectroscopy (μ-FTIR and/or μ-Raman). The data collected were statistically elaborated. The results highlighted that the laboratories had different recovery rates directly related to their specific procedures and equipment. Although there were issues related to the correct use of the standard method and to the behavior of operators, the method proved to be valid for the determination of microplastics in aqueous matrices.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper