We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Recycling of disposable single-use face masks to mitigate microfiber pollution
Summary
Researchers mechanically recycled discarded disposable face masks into polypropylene-cotton blended fabrics, demonstrating an 83% reduction in microfiber release across the product lifecycle compared to masks, though complete elimination of fiber shedding was not achievable due to the inherent properties of textile materials.
The effectiveness of disposable masks in mitigating the transmission of COVID-19 infection increased the consumption of masks. The cheaper cost and easy accessibility resulted in massive consumption and disposal of non-woven masks. The improper disposal of mask emits microfiber into the environment upon weathering. This research mechanically recycled the disposed-of masks and developed fabric from reclaimed polypropylene (rPP) fibers. Obtained rPP fibers were blended with cotton in different proportions (50/50, 60/40, 70/30 cotton/rPP) to produce rotor-spun yarns and evaluated for their performance. The results of the analysis revealed that the developed blended yarns have enough strength; however, they are inferior to the 100% virgin cotton yarns. Based on its suitability, knitted fabrics were developed from 60/40 cotton/rPP yarn. Along with the physical properties, the microfiber release behavior of the developed fabric was analyzed at its different phases of the lifecycle (wearing, washing, degradation at disposal). The microfiber release was compared with the release characteristics of disposable masks. The results showed that recycled fabrics could release 2.32 microfiber/sq. cm during wearing, 4.91 microfiber/sq. cm in laundry, and 15.50 microfiber/sq. cm at the end-of-life disposal by weathering. In contrast, the mask can release 79.43, 96.07, and 223.66 microfiber/sq. cm, respectively, for use, immediate disposal, and long-term disposal by weathering. Approximately, an 83.17% reduction in the microfiber release was reported when the masks were recycled into fabrics. The compact structure of fabric where the fibers are made into yarn resulted in lesser fiber release. Mechanical recycling of disposable masks is simple, less energy-intensive, less expensive, and can be quickly adopted. However, a 100% elimination of microfiber release was not possible in this method due to the inherent nature of the textiles.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Laundering of face masks represents an additional source of synthetic and natural microfibers to aquatic ecosystems
Researchers measured microfibers released from five types of reusable and disposable face masks during a single machine-washing cycle, finding an average of 285 microfibers per mask, with cotton-based masks releasing the most natural fibers and polyurethane masks releasing the most synthetic ones.
Mechanical Recycling of Disposable Protective Masks
Disposable face masks — a major source of pandemic-era plastic waste — were mechanically recycled through extrusion to assess whether their polypropylene layers retain useful material properties. The study found that mechanical recycling had only minor effects on thermal properties, suggesting masks could be diverted from landfill and reprocessed into raw material, reducing the chance that mask fibers fragment into environmental microplastics.
Impact of coronavirus pandemic litters on microfiber pollution—effect of personal protective equipment and disposable face masks
Researchers reviewed microfiber pollution arising from disposable and reusable face masks and personal protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic, finding that synthetic fiber shedding through littering, laundry, and disinfection represents a significant and undercharacterized addition to global microplastic pollution loads.
Single-use surgical face masks, as a potential source of microplastics: Do they act as pollutant carriers?
Researchers investigated whether single-use surgical face masks, widely used during the COVID-19 pandemic, are a potential source of microplastic fibers released into the environment. The study found that used masks entering uncontrolled waste streams can shed fibrous microplastics.
Face masks: a COVID-19 protector or environmental contaminant?
This review examined how the massive global use of disposable face masks during COVID-19 has created a significant source of microplastic pollution, with billions of masks entering the environment and releasing plastic fibers and chemical contaminants.