0
Systematic Review ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 1 ? Systematic review or meta-analysis. Synthesizes findings across many studies. Strongest evidence. Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Application of 3D Printing Technology in Sensor Development for Water Quality Monitoring

Sensors 2023 22 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 65 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Yanqi Shi, Dunzhu Li Yunhong Shi, Yanqi Shi, Yanqi Shi, Yanqi Shi, Dunzhu Li Dunzhu Li Yanqi Shi, Yanqi Shi, Yanqi Shi, Yanqi Shi, Yunhong Shi, Yanqi Shi, Yanqi Shi, Yunhong Shi, Dunzhu Li Yifan Sun, Yunhong Shi, Yunhong Shi, Luming Yang, Yunhong Shi, Zeena Wang, Dunzhu Li Yunhong Shi, Dunzhu Li Yanqi Shi, Yunhong Shi, Dunzhu Li Dunzhu Li Yanqi Shi, Yunhong Shi, Luming Yang, Luming Yang, Luming Yang, Wen Zhang, Dunzhu Li Dunzhu Li Dunzhu Li Dunzhu Li Dunzhu Li Dunzhu Li Yanqi Shi, Yunhong Shi, Dunzhu Li Yunhong Shi, Dunzhu Li Yunhong Shi, Yanqi Shi, Yunhong Shi, Yunhong Shi, Yunhong Shi, Yunhong Shi, Yunhong Shi, Yunhong Shi, Yunhong Shi, Yanqi Shi, Dunzhu Li Dunzhu Li Yunhong Shi, Yunhong Shi, Liwen Xiao, Liwen Xiao, Luming Yang, Yifan Sun, Yunhong Shi, Yunhong Shi, Yunhong Shi, Yunhong Shi, Yunhong Shi, Yanqi Shi, Wen Zhang, Yunhong Shi, Yunhong Shi, Liwen Xiao, Yunhong Shi, Liwen Xiao, Yunhong Shi, Liwen Xiao, Liwen Xiao, Yunhong Shi, Liwen Xiao, Yunhong Shi, Yanqi Shi, Yifan Sun, Yanqi Shi, Luming Yang, Zeena Wang, Zeena Wang, Luming Yang, Yunhong Shi, Luming Yang, Luming Yang, Luming Yang, Yanqi Shi, Saviour I. Okeke, Saviour I. Okeke, Yanqi Shi, Yunhong Shi, Yanqi Shi, Yunhong Shi, Yanqi Shi, Yunhong Shi, Yanqi Shi, Yanqi Shi, Yanqi Shi, Yanqi Shi, Yanqi Shi, Yanqi Shi, Luming Yang, Luming Yang, Zeena Wang, Yanqi Shi, Yanqi Shi, Luming Yang, Yanqi Shi, Liwen Xiao, Zeena Wang, Yanqi Shi, Luming Yang, Yanqi Shi, Yanqi Shi, Luming Yang, Liwen Xiao, Liwen Xiao, Wen Zhang, Luming Yang, Zihan Zhang, Luming Yang, Dunzhu Li Liwen Xiao, Liwen Xiao, Liwen Xiao, Yanqi Shi, Yunhong Shi, Liwen Xiao, Liwen Xiao, Yanqi Shi, Yanqi Shi, Yunhong Shi, Yanqi Shi, Liwen Xiao, Liwen Xiao, Liwen Xiao, Dunzhu Li Liwen Xiao, Yunhong Shi, Yunhong Shi, Liwen Xiao, Liwen Xiao, Liwen Xiao, Yunhong Shi, Yunhong Shi, Dunzhu Li

Summary

This systematic review found that 3D printing technologies, particularly fused deposition modeling and stereolithography, are enabling rapid and cost-effective development of water quality sensors. These printed sensors can detect heavy metals, pH, dissolved oxygen, and organic pollutants with accuracy approaching conventional manufactured devices.

Study Type Review

The development of sensors for water quality monitoring is crucial to protect water quality, aquatic biota and human health. Traditional sensor manufacturing methods have significant drawbacks, such as low fabrication freedom, limited material choice and expensive manufacturing cost. As a possible alternative method, 3D printing technologies are increasingly popular in sensor development due to their high versatility, fast fabrication/modification, powerful processing of different materials and ease of incorporation with other sensor systems. Surprisingly, a systematic review examining the application of 3D printing technology in water monitoring sensors has not yet been conducted. Here, we summarized the development history, market share and advantages/disadvantages of typical 3D printing techniques. Specifically focused on the 3D-printed sensor for water quality monitoring, we then reviewed the applications of 3D printing in the development of sensors' supporting platform, cell, sensing electrode as well as all-3D-printed sensors. The fabrication materials and processing, and the sensor's performances regarding detected parameters, response time and detection limit/sensitivity, were also compared and analyzed. Finally, the current drawbacks of 3D-printed water sensors and potential directions for future study were discussed. This review will substantially promote the understanding of 3D printing technology used in water sensor development and benefit the protection of water resources.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper