We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
A proibição de distribuição de sacolas plásticas descartáveis: uma análise a partir da proteção ambiental e da liberdade econômica
Summary
Researchers examined the constitutional legality of Brazilian state and municipal laws banning disposable plastic bags, concluding that such bans are materially constitutional because environmental protection — including reducing microplastic pollution that has been detected in the human body — takes precedence over economic freedom claims.
Plastic is one of the most widely used materials due to their versatility, as they are cheap, water resistant, durable and at the same time malleable enough to be used in different industries. Poor waste management and widespread consumption of disposable plastic items, known for their short service life, such as cutlery, straws, and bags, makes Brazil one of the largest producers of this type of waste. Therefore, it is possible to find small plastic particles, called microplastics, anywhere in nature including in the human body. Due to the lack of Brazilian legislation at the federal level to combat plastic pollution, there is a growing trend of state and municipal legislation that restrict or prohibit the consumption of these disposable objects, especially plastic bags. However, associations and representatives of the plastic industry frequently question the constitutionality of these laws in the Judiciary, claiming the violation of free initiative as a prerogative of economic freedom guaranteed by the Federal Constitution of 1988. The debate reached the Federal Supreme Court in different processes, and it recognized the general repercussion of the theme in Extraordinary Appeal n. 732686. Given this context, this research seeks to assess whether prohibitions on the delivery of plastic bags in commercial establishments are materially constitutional. From the deductive method, through a bibliographical and documentary research, the study focused on analyzing the constitutional principle of economic freedom and the fundamental rights and duties related to the environment. It is concluded that these provisions are constitutional, since the Constitution itself adopts the theory of sustainable development that imposes a necessary confluence between environmental protection and economic freedom.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Contamination by plastics and microplastics: (re)knowing the lived reality.
This Brazilian literature review examines the environmental impact of plastics and microplastics across different pollution scenarios, discussing the history of plastic production and consumption, relevant environmental legislation, and the importance of recycling in addressing plastic contamination.
El Uso Indiscriminado Del Plástico Contamina El Medio Ambiente Y Vulnera Los Derechos De La Naturaleza
This Spanish-language legal and environmental analysis from Ecuador examines how the indiscriminate use of plastic violates the constitutional Rights of Nature framework. It argues that existing environmental laws in Ecuador are insufficient to address the scale of plastic pollution and calls for stronger legal protections.
Guarda Municipal Em Ações Ambientais Efetivas Na Comunidade De Nossa Senhora Do Livramento Da Reserva De Desenvolvimento Sustentável Do Tupé: Uma Análise À Luz Da Constituição Federal E Das Leis Específicas Garantidoras De Um Patrulhamento Ambiental Alternativo Nas Unidades De Conservação De Manaus
Not relevant to microplastics research; the title describes a Brazilian study on municipal environmental policing in a sustainable development reserve in Manaus, though the abstract has been incorrectly populated with a microplastics health review — this is a data error in the record.
The paradox of plastic bag legislation: How bans and taxes affect PM2.5 air pollution in 208 countries
Researchers analyzed plastic bag regulations in 208 countries and found that outright bans generally reduce fine particle (PM2.5) air pollution, while plastic bag taxes unexpectedly increase it — likely because alternative bags require more energy-intensive production. The findings reveal that poorly designed plastic policies can create unintended environmental trade-offs.
Public policies to mitigate plastic pollution and adhere to the circular economy: A case study from Ecuador
This study examines Ecuador as a case study in public policy for plastic pollution management, analyzing national legislation including the Single-Use Plastics Rationalization Law and the Inclusive Circular Economy Law, concluding that Ecuador's regulatory framework offers a transferable model for other countries seeking to reduce plastic production and promote circular economy principles.