0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Nanoplastics Sign in to save

Quantifying the uncertainty and errors between common analytical methods for measuring airborne microplastics

2023 2 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Dušan Materić, Laura E. Revell, Dušan Materić, Dušan Materić, Dušan Materić, Dušan Materić, Dušan Materić, Dušan Materić, Dušan Materić, Dušan Materić, Dušan Materić, Dušan Materić, Dušan Materić, Dušan Materić, Dušan Materić, Dušan Materić, Dušan Materić, Laura E. Revell, Laura E. Revell, Laura E. Revell, Laura E. Revell, Anna J. MacDonald, Deonie Allen, Deonie Allen, Deonie Allen, Deonie Allen, Alex Aves, Alex Aves, Alex Aves, Alex Aves, Alex Aves, Alex Aves, Sally Gaw Alex Aves, Alex Aves, Alex Aves, Dušan Materić, Deonie Allen, Deonie Allen, Deonie Allen, Deonie Allen, Deonie Allen, Sally Gaw Dušan Materić, Dušan Materić, Dušan Materić, Laura E. Revell, Dušan Materić, Laura E. Revell, Dušan Materić, Laura E. Revell, Laura E. Revell, Dušan Materić, Dušan Materić, Laura E. Revell, Dušan Materić, Dušan Materić, Deonie Allen, S. W. Allen, S. W. Allen, Deonie Allen, Alex Aves, Deonie Allen, Deonie Allen, Deonie Allen, Dušan Materić, Dušan Materić, Sally Gaw Dušan Materić, Sally Gaw Sally Gaw Sally Gaw Anna J. MacDonald, Deonie Allen, Alex Aves, Sally Gaw Alex Aves, Laura E. Revell, Sally Gaw Sally Gaw Laura E. Revell, Deonie Allen, Laura E. Revell, Anna MacDonald, Dušan Materić, Dušan Materić, Laura E. Revell, Sally Gaw Sally Gaw Sally Gaw Sally Gaw Sally Gaw Sally Gaw Sally Gaw Sally Gaw Sally Gaw Deonie Allen, Deonie Allen, Deonie Allen, Deonie Allen, Deonie Allen, Deonie Allen, Sally Gaw Dušan Materić, Sally Gaw Dušan Materić, Sally Gaw Sally Gaw Sally Gaw Sally Gaw Laura E. Revell, Sally Gaw Sally Gaw Dušan Materić, Dušan Materić, Sally Gaw Deonie Allen, Laura E. Revell, Dušan Materić, Laura E. Revell, Dušan Materić, Dušan Materić, Sally Gaw Dušan Materić, Sally Gaw Sally Gaw Sally Gaw Sally Gaw Alex Aves, Laura E. Revell, Laura E. Revell, Laura E. Revell, Deonie Allen, Deonie Allen, Deonie Allen, S. W. Allen, Deonie Allen, Dušan Materić, Dušan Materić, Dušan Materić, Laura E. Revell, Dušan Materić, Dušan Materić, Sally Gaw Dušan Materić, Perry Davy, Sally Gaw Sebastian Naeher, Sally Gaw Deonie Allen, Deonie Allen, Dušan Materić, Laura E. Revell, Laura E. Revell, Laura E. Revell, Sally Gaw

Summary

Researchers describe an ongoing inter-laboratory experiment comparing five common airborne microplastic analysis methods — including µFTIR, µRaman, fluorescence microscopy, and Py-GC/MS — using split samples collected at a remote New Zealand site, aiming to quantify biases between methods and improve comparability across global studies.

In recent years airborne microplastics have emerged as a ubiquitous pollutant worldwide, with negative implications for ecosystems, climate and human health. The differing sampling and analysis techniques used amongst micro- and nanoplastic research groups limits our understanding of the global distribution of airborne microplastics and nanoplastics. We present plans and progress for an ongoing coordinated inter-laboratory experiment, designed to elucidate strengths and weaknesses of individual analysis methods. Daily active pumped air samples were collected in a controlled manner at a remote site in Canterbury, New Zealand, alongside weekly deposition samples. All samples were divided evenly, using specific contamination controls, into four sample sets for interlaboratory method comparisons, and distributed to participating research groups in New Zealand, Germany and the UK. Samples will be analysed using common microplastic analysis techniques: micro-Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (µFTIR), micro-Raman spectroscopy (µRaman), fluorescence microscopy, pyrolysis – gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (Py-GC/MS), and thermal desorption – proton transfer reaction – mass spectrometry (TD-PTR-MS). The results will allow quantification of the relative uncertainties and biases associated with each individual method, and inform how future airborne microplastics studies performed with different analytical methods should be interpreted.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper