0
Article Tier 2 Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Remediation Sign in to save

Distribution and removal of microplastics in a horizontal sub-surface flow laboratory constructed wetland and their effects on the treatment efficiency

Chemical Engineering Journal 2023 50 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers investigated microplastic retention in a laboratory-scale constructed wetland, finding that the wetland effectively captured microbeads and fibers while examining how accumulated microplastics affected the treatment efficiency for carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus removal.

Study Type Environmental

Constructed wetlands are commonly used to treat domestic wastewater, but the extent to which microplastics are retained in constructed wetlands and the impact this has on their efficiency are not known. In this context, we investigated retention of microplastics (microbeads and fibres) and their effects on the removal of carbonaceous (expressed as chemical oxygen demand (COD), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5), and dissolved organic carbon (DOC)), nitrogenous (N-NH4+, N-NO3-, and N-NO2-), and phosphorous (P-PO43-) matters in a horizontal sub-surface flow laboratory constructed wetland (LCW) under continuous flow. The LCW was in operation for 257 days, with the first 78 days without microplastics and microplastics added weekly during the next 179 days. The presence of microplastics had no significant effect on COD, BOD5, DOC, N-NH4+, and N-NO3- removal, while a statistically significant decrease in N-NO2- and an increase in P-PO43- concentrations in the effluent were observed after the addition of microplastics. Microplastics were efficiently retained in the LCW, and only 0.296% and 0.003% of the total microbeads and fibres, respectively, were detected in the effluent. Thus, it is evident that constructed wetlands are an effective barrier to the release of microplastics into the aquatic environment, but the high retention and thus continuous accumulation of microplastics may alter the nutrient cycling in constructed wetlands.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Distribution and fate of microplastics in a laboratory surface-flow constructed wetland

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers tracked how different types of microplastics (polyethylene microbeads, rubber fragments, and plastic fibers) were distributed and retained in a laboratory-scale constructed wetland planted with aquatic macrophytes. The plants and substrate effectively trapped microplastics, suggesting constructed wetlands can provide additional removal of plastic particles beyond conventional wastewater treatment.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics profile in constructed wetlands: Distribution, retention and implications

AI summary Read the abstract

This study assessed microplastic distribution, retention, and implications within constructed wetlands used for wastewater treatment, finding that wetlands trap substantial quantities of MPs but that retention efficiency varies by plant species and wetland design. The results suggest constructed wetlands both remove and potentially accumulate MPs as a secondary pollution source.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics occurrence and fate in full-scale treatment wetlands

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers assessed microplastic occurrence and fate across full-scale treatment wetlands, finding that constructed wetlands effectively remove a significant proportion of MPs from wastewater but that removal efficiency varies with wetland design and MP characteristics.

Article Tier 2

Assessment of microplastics accumulation and aging in horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands.

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers studied microplastic buildup in two constructed wetlands that treat wastewater in Spain, finding microplastics, mostly fibers, collected at different depths and locations depending on treatment type, with removal efficiency around 97%. Plastics showed signs of physical and chemical breakdown over time, and were also found in plant roots.

Article Tier 2

Horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands as tertiary treatment: Can they be an efficient barrier for microplastics pollution?

AI summary Read the abstract

Horizontal subsurface-flow constructed wetlands used as tertiary wastewater treatment removed 88% of microplastics from secondary effluent, contributing to an overall 98% reduction across the full treatment plant. Macroinvertebrates living in the wetland also ingested microplastics, suggesting biological uptake plays a role in plastic retention within the wetland ecosystem.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper