We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Distribution and removal of microplastics in a horizontal sub-surface flow laboratory constructed wetland and their effects on the treatment efficiency
Summary
Researchers investigated microplastic retention in a laboratory-scale constructed wetland, finding that the wetland effectively captured microbeads and fibers while examining how accumulated microplastics affected the treatment efficiency for carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus removal.
Constructed wetlands are commonly used to treat domestic wastewater, but the extent to which microplastics are retained in constructed wetlands and the impact this has on their efficiency are not known. In this context, we investigated retention of microplastics (microbeads and fibres) and their effects on the removal of carbonaceous (expressed as chemical oxygen demand (COD), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5), and dissolved organic carbon (DOC)), nitrogenous (N-NH4+, N-NO3-, and N-NO2-), and phosphorous (P-PO43-) matters in a horizontal sub-surface flow laboratory constructed wetland (LCW) under continuous flow. The LCW was in operation for 257 days, with the first 78 days without microplastics and microplastics added weekly during the next 179 days. The presence of microplastics had no significant effect on COD, BOD5, DOC, N-NH4+, and N-NO3- removal, while a statistically significant decrease in N-NO2- and an increase in P-PO43- concentrations in the effluent were observed after the addition of microplastics. Microplastics were efficiently retained in the LCW, and only 0.296% and 0.003% of the total microbeads and fibres, respectively, were detected in the effluent. Thus, it is evident that constructed wetlands are an effective barrier to the release of microplastics into the aquatic environment, but the high retention and thus continuous accumulation of microplastics may alter the nutrient cycling in constructed wetlands.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Microplastics profile in constructed wetlands: Distribution, retention and implications
This study assessed microplastic distribution, retention, and implications within constructed wetlands used for wastewater treatment, finding that wetlands trap substantial quantities of MPs but that retention efficiency varies by plant species and wetland design. The results suggest constructed wetlands both remove and potentially accumulate MPs as a secondary pollution source.
Microplastics occurrence and fate in full-scale treatment wetlands
Researchers assessed microplastic occurrence and fate across full-scale treatment wetlands, finding that constructed wetlands effectively remove a significant proportion of MPs from wastewater but that removal efficiency varies with wetland design and MP characteristics.
Horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands as tertiary treatment: Can they be an efficient barrier for microplastics pollution?
Horizontal subsurface-flow constructed wetlands used as tertiary wastewater treatment removed 88% of microplastics from secondary effluent, contributing to an overall 98% reduction across the full treatment plant. Macroinvertebrates living in the wetland also ingested microplastics, suggesting biological uptake plays a role in plastic retention within the wetland ecosystem.
Impact of microplastics on the treatment performance of constructed wetlands: Based on substrate characteristics and microbial activities
Researchers found that polystyrene microplastic accumulation in constructed wetlands initially improved nitrogen removal efficiency but ultimately impaired treatment performance over a 370-day experiment, altering substrate characteristics and microbial community activities.
Transport and fate of microplastics in constructed wetlands: A microcosm study
This study tested microplastic removal in constructed wetlands using different particle shapes and sizes, finding 81.6% removal in surface flow systems and 100% removal in horizontal subsurface flow systems, with biofilm attachment and physical filtration as key retention mechanisms.