We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Prevalence and characterisation of microfibres along the Kenyan and Tanzanian coast
Summary
This study characterized microfibres collected along the Kenyan and Tanzanian coast, finding that both plastic and non-plastic fibres were abundant in coastal environments and that non-plastic fibres from natural and semi-synthetic textiles constitute a substantial but often overlooked fraction of coastal microfibre pollution.
Microplastic pollution is ubiquitous, with textiles being a major source of one of the dominant microplastic types—microfibres. Microfibres have been discovered in the aquatic environment and marine biota, demonstrating direct infiltration in the environment. However, the impact of non-plastic microfibres has been overlooked until recently despite their prevalence and the ecotoxicological risk posed by chemical dyes and finishes used during processing. During an expedition from Lamu to Zanzibar (East Africa), a citizen science strategy was employed to innovate, educate and influence microfibre pollution reform through the Flipflopi project, a circular economy effort to stop the use of single-use plastic. Simple sampling methods were developed to replace costly equipment, which local citizens could use to partake in the collection and sampling of surface water samples from the previously understudied Kenyan and Tanzanian coast. To maintain the reliability of samples and to minimise contamination, a forensic science strategy was embedded throughout the methodology of the study, collection and analysis of the samples. A total of 2,403 microfibres from 37 sites were recovered and fully characterised with 55% found to be of natural origin, 8% regenerated cellulosic and 37% synthetic microfibres. Natural microfibres were in higher abundance in 33 of the 37 sampled sites. Congruent with recent studies, these findings further support the need for greater understanding of the anthropogenic impact of natural microfibres.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Microfibers in oceanic surface waters: A global characterization
A global analysis of 916 seawater samples from six ocean basins characterized microfibers as ubiquitous contaminants, finding that many are not synthetic textiles but natural or semi-synthetic materials, questioning the assumption that all environmental fibers are microplastic.
Microplastics in marine beach and seabed sediments along the coasts of Dar es Salaam and Zanzibar in Tanzania
Researchers found widespread microplastic contamination in beach and seabed sediments along the coasts of Dar es Salaam and Zanzibar, Tanzania, with polyethylene and polyester the dominant polymers and fragments and fibers the most common particle types.
Microplastics pollution in the sediments of creeks and estuaries of Kenya, western Indian Ocean
Microplastic contamination was documented in sediments of creeks and estuaries along the Kenyan coast in the western Indian Ocean, with higher concentrations near urban centers and tourist areas, filling a major gap in microplastic monitoring data for East African coastal ecosystems and confirming regional contamination levels comparable to more studied ocean regions.
Microplastics in Marine Sediments from Dar es Salaam Coast: Spatial Distribution and Characterization
Researchers found microplastic contamination in marine sediments at four beaches along the Dar es Salaam coast in Tanzania, with the highest concentrations near the surface layer. Identified polymers included polypropylene, polyethylene, polyurethane, and polyamide in fiber, fragment, sponge, and pellet forms.
Occurrence, sources, fate and transport of textile fibers in oceanic environments
This review covers the occurrence, sources, transport pathways, and environmental fate of synthetic and natural textile fibers in oceanic environments. Despite global fiber production exceeding 107 million tonnes annually, the authors find that natural fibers (cotton, wool) are actually more abundant than synthetic fibers in most environmental samples.