0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Difference in the fate of surface and subsurface microplastics: an example for open and coastal waters

2023 Score: 30 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Svetlana Pakhomova, Igor Zhdanov, Anfisa Berezina, Evgeny Yakushev, Evgeny Yakushev

Summary

Researchers compared the behavior of surface and subsurface microplastics in open ocean and coastal waters, finding that vertical mixing and biological processes move substantial quantities of plastic below the surface. Subsurface sampling revealed microplastics that would be missed by surface net tows alone. The findings suggest that surface-based microplastic monitoring significantly underestimates the total plastic burden in the ocean water column.

Study Type Environmental

Plastic is recognized as a threat to marine ecosystems and estimating the level of plastic and microplastics (MP) pollution of the World Ocean is nowadays the goal of many studies. However, the use of different methods for sampling and analysis of MPs leads to the problem of comparing the results obtained. Studies on surface MP pollution of the surface sea water are based on the application of the manta or neuston nets that collect water from the upper 10-20 cm layer (the “surface” MP) or submersible pumping systems, that collect water from the water layer 3-5 m below the sea surface (the “subsurface” MP). These two techniques allow to collect particles of different size fraction, i.e. >300 µm for the surface MP and >100 µm for subsurface MP. The aim of this work was to study the distribution of surface and subsurface MPs and to reveal an influence of oceanographic conditions on their spatial distribution as an example of the open ocean waters of the Central Atlantic and coastal water in Norwegian fjords. It was shown that microplastics found in the surface and subsurface layers differ not only in the size of the items found, but also in morphology, types of polymers, abundance, weight concentration and their spatial distribution. Different hydrodynamic processes affect the fate of plastic occurring exactly at the sea surface and several meters deeper. MPs inhabiting the subsurface waters (about 3-5 m depth) have buoyancy close to neutral and appear to be suspended in the surface mixed layer and are readily transported from the sources to the distant regions by ocean currents. Subsurface turbulence is probably the main process that maintains the MPs in the near-surface part of the water column. In contrast, the surface MPs (which are captured by sampling with surface nets) have positive buoyancy and its spatial distribution is significantly influenced by water dynamics, wind and waves, which led to a more scattered distribution on the ocean surface. It was shown that surface and subsurface microplastics differ significantly in a number of properties and, apparently, they should be considered as two independent groups that may have different sources, and their distribution is driven by different hydrophysical processes. Thus, MPs data collected using both methods simultaneously could provide additional information about MPs fate in the ocean.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Differences in the Fate of Surface and Subsurface Microplastics: A Case Study in the Central Atlantic

Researchers studied microplastic distribution in the Central Atlantic and found that surface and subsurface samples differ not only in particle size but also in morphology, polymer types, abundance, and spatial distribution, driven by distinct hydrodynamic processes at the sea surface versus a few meters below.

Article Tier 2

Elucidating the vertical transport of microplastics in the water column: A review of sampling methodologies and distributions

This review synthesized sampling methodologies and findings on microplastic vertical distribution in the water column, identifying that surface trawl studies dramatically underestimate total water column burdens and that sinking behavior, biofouling, and hydrodynamic processes create complex depth-dependent distribution patterns.

Article Tier 2

The vertical distribution of buoyant plastics at sea: an observational study in the North Atlantic Gyre

Field measurements of buoyant plastic particles at multiple depths in the ocean showed that concentrations decrease sharply below a few meters, with turbulence mixing plastics downward. The data validate model predictions and confirm that surface net trawls substantially undercount total plastic in the water column.

Article Tier 2

The effect of wind mixing on the vertical distribution of buoyant plastic debris

Researchers modeled and measured how wind mixing affects the vertical distribution of buoyant plastic debris in the ocean, finding that turbulent mixing drives plastics below the surface and explains why surface sampling underestimates total plastic concentrations.

Article Tier 2

Widespread distribution of microplastics in subsurface seawater in the NE Pacific Ocean

Researchers detected and characterized microplastics in subsurface seawater samples collected across the northeast Pacific, finding widespread contamination below the surface layer and providing insight into how microplastics distribute through the water column.

Share this paper