0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

What can global hydrological models tell us about sources and flows of riverine plastics?

2023 Score: 30 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Alena Bartošová, Fanny Ståhl, Conrad Brendel, Johan Temnerud, Jan Havelka, Berit Arheimer

Summary

Researchers used global hydrological models to estimate the sources and flows of riverine plastic pollution entering the ocean from different watersheds worldwide. The models highlighted that plastic delivery is highly variable across regions and is strongly linked to population density and waste management quality. This type of global modeling is essential for prioritizing where plastic waste reduction efforts will have the greatest impact.

Plastic pollution is one of the major global water quality issues. Yet the lack of consistent data and standardized monitoring and assessment methods leads to a wide range of uncertainties in estimating the plastic load that is being delivered to marine environments. At the same time, continental and global dynamic hydrological models are becoming more available for large-scale estimation of time-dynamic water fluxes into sea basins. One such tool is a dynamic process-based rainfall-runoff and water quality model Hydrological Predictions for Environment (HYPE) and its global application, World-Wide HYPE (WWH, Arheimer et al., 2020).Here, we present the first results from simulating global riverine plastic pollution using WWH. The model development is based on the results of the global literature review of sources of microplastics through the lens of a hydrological modeler. Traditional model calibration techniques may not be appropriate in this case due to insufficient number of data points, large variability in plastic characteristics and sampling techniques applied in the collected monitoring studies, as well as large uncertainty and a lack of current knowledge of transport and transformation processes in water bodies. Thus, an ensemble of WWH model setups was developed where the model structure and hydrology is the same and the model parameters that affect generation, transformation, and transport of plastic from various land uses, sanitation categories, and in rivers are varied to explore the defined parameter space. Collected data together with other global estimates were then used to evaluate the ensemble with a weight of evidence approach, highlighting sources and processes of major significance and focusing the ensemble towards a realistic set. Further model error analyses indicate which sources and processes play an important role in transport of riverine plastics as well as how different monitoring approaches can affect the results.References:Arheimer, B., Pimentel, R., Isberg, K., Crochemore, L., Andersson, J. C. M., Hasan, A., and Pineda, L., 2020. Global catchment modelling using World-Wide HYPE (WWH), open data and stepwise parameter estimation, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 24, 535–559, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-535-202

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

More than 1000 rivers account for 80% of global riverine plastic emissions into the ocean

Researchers developed a model to estimate global riverine plastic emissions into the ocean and found that more than 1,000 rivers account for 80% of emissions, rather than just a handful of large rivers as previously assumed. The study suggests that plastic pollution is geographically distributed across many smaller river systems worldwide, which has important implications for developing targeted mitigation strategies.

Article Tier 2

A comparative analysis of global models for riverine plastic input to the ocean

Researchers compared existing global models estimating riverine plastic input to the ocean, identifying key sources of divergence including the number of rivers modelled, item-to-mass conversion factors, and extrapolation methods from microplastic to macroplastic estimates. The comparative analysis highlighted that modelling choices lead to substantial uncertainty in global plastic flux estimates, underscoring the need for a standardised science-policy framework to evaluate plastic pollution mitigation.

Article Tier 2

Revising the role of discharge in global river plastic transport

Researchers propose that the amount of plastic available for transport — determined by human activity and plastic stockpiles on land — limits how much plastic rivers carry to the ocean, not the river's water flow as previously assumed. This shift in thinking reshapes global plastic pollution models and helps identify better targets for reducing plastic reaching the sea.

Article Tier 2

River plastic emissions to the world’s oceans

Researchers built a global model to estimate how much plastic waste enters the ocean from rivers, combining data on waste management, population density, and water flow patterns. They estimated that rivers deliver between 1.15 and 2.41 million tonnes of plastic to the oceans annually, with over 74% of emissions occurring between May and October. The top 20 polluting rivers, mostly in Asia, accounted for 67% of the global total, providing key data for targeting cleanup and prevention efforts.

Article Tier 2

Modelling global river export of microplastics to the marine environment: Sources and future trends

Researchers developed the GREMiS model to estimate global river export of microplastics to the ocean, projecting that annual marine inputs will increase significantly under business-as-usual plastic production scenarios.

Share this paper