0
Article Tier 2 Detection Methods Human Health Effects Sign in to save

Characterization and ecotoxicological evaluation of microparticles from polyurethane foam and Luffa cylindrica for domestic use

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers characterized microparticles shed from flexible polyurethane foam and Luffa cylindrica sponges used in household cleaning and evaluated their ecotoxicological effects, finding evidence of potential harm to organisms even at low concentrations. The study highlights everyday domestic products as underappreciated sources of microplastic-like particle pollution.

The high consumption of polymeric materials, more specifically plastics, it is a relevant problem to emerging contaminants, as over time they can fragment and/or degrade, generating microparticles, whose effects are still little known in the literature for polyurethane (PU), however, there is evidence that they are harmful for the health of organisms in the short and long term. Flexible polyurethane foam (PUF) is a synthetic polymer with applications ranging from thermal insulation to scrub sponges. However, a problem that is observed in this class of polymers is that, multipurpose sponges, for example, end up generating secondary microplastics, in addition to leaching additives, which are harmful to organisms. This work aimed to study the genotoxic, mutagenic and biochemical effects (related to oxidative stress and neurotoxicity) of microparticles generated from sponge for domestic use and compare it with microparticles from vegetable loofah (Luffa cylindrica) in Oreochromis niloticus (Tilapia). In addition, the toxic potential of the leachate, PUF particles and abrasive fiber for Daphnia magna and Artemia salina was evaluated. The structural, morphological characterization and thermal behavior of the samples was carried out through analysis of spectroscopy in the infrared region with Fourier Transform, thermogravimetry, scanning electron microscopy and wide-angle X-ray diffraction. For the evaluation of the biological effects, O. niloticus fingerlings were submitted to a subchronic bioassay of 14 days with partial daily renewal of water and sample, at concentrations of 0.2 mg∙L- ¹; 1 mg∙L- ¹ and 5 mg∙L- ¹. Microcrustaceans were exposed to microparticle concentrations ranging from 20 to 200 mg∙L- ¹ for D. magna and 1 to 23 g∙L- ¹ for A. salina. After the bioassay, biochemical (acetylcholinesterase, glutathione-S-transferase, lipoperoxidation and catalase) and genetic (comet assay) biomarkers for fingerlings and the mean effective concentration of sponge particles and leachate toxicity factor for microcrustaceans were evaluated. Through these data it was possible to verify that the microparticles and the leachate from the scrub sponge showed acute toxicity for the microcrustaceans. After the bioassay with O. niloticus, it was possible to observe that all samples caused lipid peroxidation and had the potential to inhibit muscle AChE activity, while the sample of loofah stimulated brain AChE. The samples from scrub sponge had genotoxic potential and the abrasive fiber sample affected the nutritional status of fingerlings. This work brings evidence about the toxic effects caused by multipurpose sponges compared to vegetable loofah, which indicates that this material is a viable alternative from an environmental point of view, but it is not inert.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Measuring the Effects of Microplastics on Sponges

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers investigated how microplastics affect marine sponges, which are important filter feeders in coastal ecosystems, noting that very little research had examined sponge-microplastic interactions. The study aimed to fill a knowledge gap about microplastic impacts on a key group of organisms that filter large volumes of seawater.

Article Tier 2

Measuring the Effects of Microplastics on Sponges

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers investigated how microplastics affect marine sponges, which are important filter feeders in coastal ecosystems, noting that very little research had examined sponge-microplastic interactions. The study aimed to fill a knowledge gap about microplastic impacts on a key group of benthic organisms that filter large volumes of seawater.

Article Tier 2

The neglected potential source of microplastics from daily necessities: A study on protective mobile phone cases

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers identified daily household necessities including synthetic sponges, cleaning tools, and personal care items as overlooked sources of microplastic fibers and fragments. Abrasion and degradation of these common products released MPs at measurable rates, contributing to household and indoor microplastic exposure.

Article Tier 2

Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future?

AI summary Read the abstract

This review critically evaluates published research on microplastic effects on aquatic organisms and identifies significant gaps between laboratory experiments and real-world conditions. Researchers found that most studies use polystyrene spheres at concentrations far higher than those found in the environment, while the most common microplastics in nature are fragments and fibers of other polymer types. The study calls for more environmentally realistic experimental designs to better understand the actual ecological risks of microplastic pollution.

Article Tier 2

Sponges as bioindicators for microparticulate pollutants?

AI summary Read the abstract

This study investigated whether sponges can serve as bioindicators of microparticle pollution in coral reef environments, finding that sponges incorporate foreign particles including microplastics from the surrounding water. Sponges could be useful sentinel organisms for monitoring microplastic contamination in reef ecosystems given their extensive filter feeding.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper