0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Organic or junk food? Microplastic contamination in Antarctic krill and salps

Royal Society Open Science 2023 46 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 60 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Emily Rowlands, Emily Rowlands, Emily Rowlands, Elisa Bergami Elisa Bergami Elisa Bergami Emily Rowlands, Emily Rowlands, Emily Rowlands, Elisa Bergami Elisa Bergami Laura Wilkie Johnston, Laura Wilkie Johnston, Laura Wilkie Johnston, Laura Wilkie Johnston, Clara Manno, Clara Manno, Elisa Bergami Elisa Bergami Elisa Bergami Elisa Bergami Elisa Bergami Clara Manno, Elisa Bergami Emily Rowlands, Elisa Bergami Elisa Bergami Elisa Bergami Elisa Bergami Elisa Bergami Elisa Bergami Elisa Bergami Elisa Bergami Elisa Bergami Elisa Bergami Elisa Bergami Elisa Bergami Elisa Bergami Clara Manno, Clara Manno, Emily Rowlands, Emily Rowlands, Elisa Bergami Elisa Bergami Elisa Bergami Elisa Bergami Elisa Bergami Emily Rowlands, Clara Manno, Emily Rowlands, Elisa Bergami Elisa Bergami Clara Manno, Clara Manno, Clara Manno, Elisa Bergami Clara Manno, Elisa Bergami Elisa Bergami Elisa Bergami Clara Manno, Elisa Bergami Elisa Bergami Clara Manno, Elisa Bergami Elisa Bergami Elisa Bergami Clara Manno, Clara Manno, Clara Manno, Clara Manno, Clara Manno, Elisa Bergami Clara Manno, Elisa Bergami Clara Manno, Elisa Bergami

Summary

Researchers examined Antarctic krill and salps for microplastic contamination and confirmed that both species are actively ingesting plastic particles in the Southern Ocean. Krill contained more microplastics per individual than salps, but the particles found in salps were larger, likely reflecting differences in their feeding strategies. The study provides the first comparative field evidence that microplastic ingestion is an ongoing process in these key Antarctic species, raising concerns about plastic pollution entering polar food webs.

Study Type Environmental

Microplastics (MP) have been reported in Southern Ocean (SO), where they are likely to encounter Antarctic zooplankton and enter pelagic food webs. Here we assess the presence of MP within Antarctic krill (<i>Euphausia superba</i>) and salps (<i>Salpa thompsoni</i>) and quantify their abundance and type by micro-Fourier transform infrared microscopy. MP were found in both species, with fibres being more abundant than fragments (krill: 56.25% and salps: 22.32% of the total MP). Polymer identification indicated MP originated from both local and distant sources. Our findings prove how <i>in situ</i> MP ingestion from these organisms is a real and ongoing process in the SO. MP amount was higher in krill (2.13 ± 0.26 MP ind<sup>-1</sup>) than salps (1.38 ± 0.42 MP ind<sup>-1</sup>), while MP size extracted from krill (130 ± 30 µm) was significantly lower than MP size from salps (330 ± 50 µm). We suggest that differences between abundance and size of MP ingested by these two species may be related to their food strategies, their ability to fragment MP as well as different human pressures within the collection areas of the study region. First comparative field-based evidence of MP in both krill and salps, two emblematic zooplankton species of the SO marine ecosystems, underlines that Antarctic marine ecosystems may be particularly sensitive to plastic pollution.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper