We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Blanks and bias in microplastic research: Implications for future quality assurance
No summary available — this paper's abstract is not included in the open metadata provided by the publisher. Learn why →
More Papers Like This
Pitfalls and Limitations in Microplastic Analyses
AI summary Read the abstract
Inconsistent sampling strategies, sample preparation methods, and analytical techniques across microplastic studies create significant pitfalls including contamination, particle loss, and misidentification that undermine comparability of results. Standardizing protocols is urgently needed to build a reliable global picture of microplastic abundance and risk.
Exploring Innovations in Microplastics Detection: A Comprehensive Methodological Review
AI summary Read the abstract
This review compares cutting-edge microplastic detection methods including hyperspectral imaging, nano-thermal analysis, and atomic force microscopy, evaluating their accuracy, efficiency, and applicability across different environments. Better detection tools are foundational to understanding the true scale of microplastic pollution and enabling the evidence-based regulations needed to protect public health.
Identification and analysis of microplastics: a systematic review of methods and techniques
AI summary Read the abstract
This systematic review of 180 microplastics studies found that µFTIR, µRaman, and pyrolysis-GC/MS are the dominant identification methods, with zinc chloride and hydrogen peroxide the most common chemicals for density separation and organic matter digestion respectively. Methodological variation across studies limits result comparability, and the review recommends standardizing reporting by identification method and carefully matching density separation solutions to target polymer densities.
Taking control of microplastics data: A comparison of control and blank data correction methods
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared six commonly used methods for correcting microplastic data using procedural controls and blanks, finding significant variability in results depending on the correction method chosen and highlighting the urgent need for standardized data quality protocols.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.