0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Sign in to save

Effects of microplastic type on growth and physiology of soil crops: Implications for farmland yield and food quality

Environmental Pollution 2023 94 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 65 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Zhanbo Wei, Qingwei Wang, Wangming Zhou, Juntao Jiang, Jiaojiao Deng

Summary

Researchers tested how two common types of microplastics (polypropylene and polyester) affect corn, soybean, and peanut crops grown in real farm conditions. The effects varied by crop and plastic type, with polypropylene generally reducing peanut growth while polyester had milder impacts. These findings suggest that microplastic contamination in agricultural soil could affect crop yields and food quality in ways that depend on which plastics are present.

Polymers

Microplastic residues pose one of the most serious environmental problems in areas where plastic mulch is used extensively. Microplastic pollution has potentially serious consequences for ecosystems and human health. Several studies have analyzed microplastics in greenhouses or laboratory climate-controlled chambers; however, field studies evaluating the effects of different microplastics on different crops in extensive farming are limited. Therefore, we selected three major crops, Zea mays (ZM, monocotyledon), Glycine max (GM, dicotyledon, aboveground-bearing), and Arachis hypogaea (AH, dicotyledon, belowground-bearing) and investigated the effect of adding polyester microplastics (PES-MPs) and polypropylene microplastics (PP-MPs). Our results demonstrate that PP-MPs and PES-MPs decreased the soil bulk density of ZM, GM, and AH. Regarding soil pH, PES-MPs increased the soil pH of AH and ZM, whereas PP-MPs decreased the soil pH of ZM, GM, and AH compared to controls. Intriguingly, different coordinated trait responses to PP-MPs and PES-MPs were observed in all crops. In general, commonly measured parameters of AH, such as plant height, culm diameter, total biomass, root biomass, PSII maximum photochemical quantum yield (Fv/Fm), hundred-gain weight, and soluble sugar tended to decrease under PP-MPs exposure; however, some indicators of ZM and GM increased under PP-MPs exposure. PES-MPs had no obviously adverse influence on the three crops, except for the biomass of GM, and even significantly increased the chlorophyll content of AH, specific leaf area, and soluble sugar of GM. Compared with PES-MPs, PP-MPs have serious negative effects on crop growth and quality, especially AH. The findings of the present study provides evidence for evaluating the impact of soil microplastic pollution on crop yield and quality in farmland and lay a foundation for future investigations on the exploration of MP toxicity mechanisms and adaptability of different crops to microplastics.

Share this paper

Discussion

Log in to join the discussion

Sign in
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.