0
Article Tier 2 Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Circular and lower impact mussel and seaweed aquaculture by a shift towards bio‐based ropes

Reviews in Aquaculture 2023 36 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

This review examines how shifting mussel and seaweed aquaculture from conventional plastic ropes to bio-based alternatives could reduce marine litter and microplastic generation. Bio-based ropes offer comparable functionality while providing better end-of-life options, including recycling and biodegradation. The transition would support circular economy principles and help reduce the aquaculture industry's contribution to ocean plastic pollution.

Abstract Worldwide, current mussel and seaweed aquaculture practices contribute to the increase of fossil fuel‐based plastic gears at sea, leading to marine litter and microplastics generation. Smart aquaculture has a great potential for shifting towards the use of lower impact bio‐based and biodegradable gears. This review defines the value chain of biogears as more sustainable gears for mussel and seaweed aquaculture, and sustainability issues covering technology, environmental impacts, economy‐market, policy, and social drivers for their potential implementation. Fit to purpose durability and functionality attributes, end‐of‐life (EoL) options and environmental benefits are key features for competitiveness of biogears versus conventional fossil fuel‐based aquaculture gears. EoL management for collection, sorting and logistics of biogears to recycling facilities is needed for the up cycling of bio‐based materials thus ensuring application of principles of circularity. The selection of the biopolymers for recyclability, improvement of the polymerisation and recycling processes together with the enhanced deployment of recycling facilities are considered as key factors for eco‐designing of circular biogears. Current policies supporting bio‐based plastics in marine applications and social benefits, as environmental sustainability, healthy products, and circular business opportunities, are likewise added value for the development and use of biogears. Overall, biogears can reduce environmental negative impacts in mussel and seaweed productions, while enabling circular use of bio‐based materials and sustainable circular bioeconomy.

More Papers Like This

Systematic Review Tier 1

Developing the Use of Wool Rope within Aquaculture—A Systematic Review

AI summary Read the abstract

This systematic review explores whether wool rope could replace plastic rope in seaweed aquaculture, reducing plastic pollution in marine environments. The research is directly relevant to microplastic concerns because conventional plastic ropes used in ocean farming gradually break down into microplastic particles that contaminate marine ecosystems and the seafood we eat.

Systematic Review Tier 1

Rethinking material use in low-trophic aquaculture: A global review

AI summary Read the abstract

This systematic review reveals that low-trophic aquaculture — farming seaweed and shellfish often promoted as sustainable — actually relies heavily on plastic materials like ropes, nets, and floats. These plastics degrade in seawater and release microplastics directly into marine environments. The findings challenge assumptions about the environmental friendliness of these farming practices.

Article Tier 2

Evaluation of the emission potential (microplastics & organic additives) by conventional or biodegradable mussel nets

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers evaluated microplastic and organic additive emission potential from conventional petro-based and biodegradable mussel farming nets under biotic and abiotic degradation conditions, assessing whether biodegradable alternatives reduce plastic pollution from aquaculture tapping net use.

Article Tier 2

Mussel power: developing a nature-based solution to marine microplastics

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers investigated whether mussels, which naturally filter large volumes of seawater, could be used as a nature-based solution to remove microplastics from coastal environments. Pilot experiments suggested that dense mussel beds could filter significant quantities of microplastic particles from the water column. The concept offers a biologically inspired approach to reducing microplastic concentrations in coastal zones, though the fate of ingested plastics in mussels requires further study.

Article Tier 2

Alternative Rope Materials in Towed Fishing Gear to Reduce Plastic Waste, A Comparative Study of Mechanical Properties and Tolerance Against Wear and Tear

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers compared the wear tolerance of 14 different rope materials in demersal fisheries, including conventional synthetic polymers and biodegradable alternatives, to identify lower-plastic options that can reduce fishing gear-derived plastic waste.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper