0
Clinical Trial ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 1 ? Systematic review or meta-analysis. Synthesizes findings across many studies. Strongest evidence. Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

First evidence of microplastics in freshwater from fish farms in Rondônia state, Brazil

Heliyon 2023 19 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 55 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Jerônimo Vieira Dantas Filho, Vinícius Perez Pedroti, Bruna Lucieny Temponi Santos, Bruna Lucieny Temponi Santos, Maria Mirtes de Lima Pinheiro, Átila Bezerra de Mira, Francisco Carlos da Silva, Emerson Carlos Soares, Jucilene Cavali, Élica Amara Cecília Guedes, Sandro de Vargas Schons

Summary

Microplastic contamination was confirmed in freshwater from 9 of 35 fish farms in the Brazilian Amazon, predominantly as blue fibers. Rainy season abundance was nearly five times higher than dry season (286 vs. 58 items/mL of blue fibers), suggesting surface runoff from urban and agricultural areas as the primary contamination pathway.

Study Type Environmental

The main aimed of this study was to provide information on microplastics present in the freshwater of fish farm ponds. In addition, the study showes a relationship between the seasonal, spatial distribution and the amount of microplastics found. This study was conducted in 35 fish farms located in the Rondônia state, Brazil, the sample collects were carried out in the two Amazonian hydrological seasons (dry and rainy). The study was developed in a completely randomized factorial scheme 35 × 3 x 3 (35 fish farms, 3 ponds and 3 repetitions per ponds). Microplastic sampling was performed following a modified method based on National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Samples of 250 mL freshwater collected, which were deionized and pre-filtered through 6.0 mm mesh granulometric sieves. The average abundances of the different hydrological seasons were compared by Student's -test, with differences statistically significant at p < 0.05. The microplastics were morphological categorized into fibers and colors blue, red or transparent. Microplastic contamination was confirmed in freshwater of 9 fish farming, with greater abundance of blue fibers and greater quantification in the rainy season. Fish farms P3, P4 and P6 had the highest quantifications of blue fiber in the two seasons (6 and 43, 19 and 56, 11 and 88 items mL, respectively). Almost all fish farms had a higher abundance of microplastics in the rainy season. It is important to highlight the prominence of microplastics in the blue fiber rainy season (286 items mL) compared to the dry season (58 items mL). Fish farms P3, P4 and P6 showed a strong positive correlation between the factors distance from the nearest urban area (r = 0.94, 0.79 and 0.97, respectively) and seasonality (r = 0.98, 0.77 and 0.96, respectively). Rainfall variations influenced the abundance of microplastics, especially of blue fibers. Fish farms are supplied with fresh water by rivers or streams, so it is possible that microplastics originate outside the fish farm, perhaps they were introduced due to high soil occupation, although surface runoff (of water contaminated by sewage) caused by heavy rains the most important factor. Therefore, one factor must be considered, surface runoff and groundwater contaminated by urban, agricultural and urban effluents may have contaminated rivers and streams and then contaminated the water in the fish farm ponds.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Far from urban areas: plastic uptake in fish populations of subtropical headwater streams

This study found plastic fibers in 38% of fish from remote subtropical headwater streams far from urban areas in Brazil, with fibers making up the fourth most common item in fish stomachs. The results suggest that even in sparsely populated landscapes, microplastic contamination of freshwater ecosystems is widespread.

Article Tier 2

First assessment of microplastic and artificial microfiber contamination in surface waters of the Amazon Continental Shelf

Researchers characterized microplastics in surface water of the Amazon Continental Shelf for the first time, finding particles at all 57 sampling sites with higher concentrations during the rainy season. Polyamide, polyurethane, and acrylonitrile butadiene styrene were the most common polymer types, and concentrations were highest near river mouths and coastal cities.

Article Tier 2

Microplastic occurrence in fish species from the Iquitos region in Peru, western Amazonia

Researchers found microplastics in 15 commercial fish species from markets in the Peruvian Amazon, detecting 2,337 particles across 61 specimens — among the first reports of microplastic contamination in fish from the Amazon basin.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics in siluriform fish sold in Itacoatiara (AM), Brazil

Researchers in Brazil found that more than 83% of two commercially sold catfish species (Pterygoplichthys pardalis and Hoplosternum littorale) collected from Amazonian floodplains were contaminated with microplastics, averaging about 2.7 particles per fish. The dominant particle types were fibers and fragments, pointing to textile and packaging waste as key sources. Because these fish are widely consumed locally, this study highlights a direct route through which microplastics enter the human diet in the Amazon region.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics in fishes in amazon riverine beaches: Influence of feeding mode and distance to urban settlements

Researchers found microplastics in the digestive tracts of 29 fish species from Amazon riverine beaches, with contamination levels influenced by fish feeding mode and distance to urban settlements within a protected area.

Share this paper