0
Article Tier 2 Human Health Effects Nanoplastics Sign in to save

Microplastics and nanoplastics toxicity assays: A revision towards to environmental-relevance in water environment

Journal of Hazardous Materials 2023 51 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

This review evaluates how well current laboratory toxicity tests for micro and nanoplastics reflect real-world conditions in water environments. The authors found that most studies use pristine plastic particles at concentrations far higher than what is found in nature, limiting the relevance of their findings. The paper calls for more environmentally realistic testing approaches to better understand the actual risks of plastic particle pollution.

Study Type In vitro

Plastic pollution poses a serious risk to the oceans, freshwater ecosystems, and land-based agricultural production. Most plastic waste enters rivers and then reaches the oceans, where its fragmentation process begins and the forming of microplastics (MPs) and nanoplastics (NPs). These particles increase their toxicity by the exposition to external factors and binding environmental pollutants, including toxins, heavy metals, persistent organic pollutants (POPs), halogenated hydrocarbons (HHCs), and other chemicals, which further and cumulatively increase the toxicity of these particles. A major disadvantage of many MNPs in vitro studies is that they do not use environmentally relevant microorganisms, which play a vital role in geobiochemical cycles. In addition, factors such as the polymer type, shapes, and sizes of the MPs and NPs, their exposure times and concentrations must be taken into account in in vitro experiments. Last but not least, it is important to ask whether to use aged particles with bound pollutants. All these factors affect the predicted effects of these particles on living systems, which may not be realistic if they are insufficiently considered. In this article, we summarize the latest findings on MNPs in the environment and propose some recommendations for future in vitro experiments on bacteria, cyanobacteria, and microalgae in water ecosystems.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Microplastic exposure studies should be environmentally realistic

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers argue that many laboratory studies on microplastic effects use concentrations far higher than what is actually found in the environment, which can lead to misleading conclusions about real-world risks. They call for experiments that better reflect environmental conditions, including realistic particle sizes, shapes, and concentrations. The study emphasizes that more environmentally relevant research is needed to accurately assess the true ecological threat of microplastic pollution.

Article Tier 2

Gaps in aquatic toxicological studies of microplastics

AI summary Read the abstract

This paper identifies key gaps in aquatic toxicological studies of microplastics, arguing that most studies use unrealistic concentrations or particle types and calling for more ecologically relevant experimental designs to better assess real-world risks.

Article Tier 2

Towards harmonized ecotoxicological effect assessment of micro- and nanoplastics in aquatic systems

AI summary Read the abstract

This review highlights the methodological problems in current microplastic and nanoplastic toxicity research on freshwater organisms, including the use of unrealistic plastic types, poor test designs, and environmentally irrelevant doses. The authors propose a harmonized framework for testing that better reflects real-world conditions, including more realistic particle types and exposure levels. Better standardized research is essential for accurately assessing the true environmental and health risks of micro and nanoplastic pollution.

Article Tier 2

Relevant and Realistic Assessments of Micro- and Nanoplastics in the Environment

AI summary Read the abstract

This paper discusses methodological challenges in microplastic risk assessment, arguing that studies using only clean, uniform lab-prepared particles may not reflect the complex, mixed-type plastic particles actually found in the environment. More realistic experimental conditions are needed to generate data that accurately predicts ecological harm from microplastic pollution.

Article Tier 2

Reflection on the utilization of microplastics as experiment material in laboratory

AI summary Read the abstract

This perspective paper analyzed 204 microplastics toxicology studies and found significant mismatches between the types of microplastics used as experimental materials and those actually found in the environment. The authors argue that using ecologically unrealistic plastic types and concentrations in lab experiments limits the ability to draw meaningful conclusions about real-world risks.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper