0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Review: Monitoring to conservation: The science–policy nexus of plastics and seabirds — R1/PR6

2023 Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Bonnie M. Hamilton, Bethany L. Clark, Stephanie B. Borrelle

Summary

This is a peer review recommendation document for a review article on marine microplastic toxicology that covers bioaccumulation and biological impacts across multiple marine organism groups. The underlying review is relevant to understanding the environmental and potential human health risks posed by microplastics in the ocean. As a peer review artefact, it is not original research but indicates the paper is part of a rigorous scientific publication process.

Study Type Environmental

Seabirds have been the messengers of marine plastics pollution since the 1950s, not long after plastics began to be commercially manufactured. In the decades since, a number of multilateral agreements have emerged to address marine plastics pollution that have been informed by research and monitoring on plastic ingestion in seabirds. Seabirds continue to serve as effective monitors for plastics pollution in the oceans, and increasingly of the chemical contamination from the marine environment as plastic additives and chemicals can adsorb and accumulate in seabirds’ tissues. Plastics pollution has far-reaching ecological impacts, but the motivation for addressing the issue has escalated rapidly at the international level. Seabirds are also the most globally threatened group of birds and require concerted conservation actions to mitigate population declines from multiple pressures. However, most policy mechanisms focus on the monitoring and mitigation of anthropogenically induced stressors, using seabird data, and often fail to include mechanisms to conserve the messengers. In this review, we discuss how research on the impacts of plastics on seabirds is used to inform policy and highlight the competing interests of monitoring and conservation that emerge from this approach. Finally, we discuss policy opportunities to ensure seabirds can continue to be the indicators of ocean health and simultaneously achieve conservation goals.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Review: Environmental toxicology of marine microplastic pollution — R0/PR3

This is a third peer review document associated with the same marine microplastic toxicology review, which covers bioaccumulation and biological effects of microplastics across multiple marine organism groups. The review it supports is a significant synthesis of evidence on how microplastics harm marine ecosystems. As a peer review artefact, it is not original research but reflects the rigour applied to publishing key microplastics science.

Article Tier 2

Recommendation: Environmental toxicology of marine microplastic pollution — R0/PR4

This is a peer review document for a review of marine microplastic environmental toxicology. The underlying review synthesises evidence on microplastic accumulation and toxic effects in phytoplankton, zooplankton, bivalves, and fish. Like other peer review artefacts in this set, it is relevant to microplastics but is not original research.

Review Tier 2

Microplastics and the Impact of Plastic on Wildlife: A Literature Review

This review synthesizes evidence on microplastic ingestion and accumulation in seabirds and wildlife, examining the pathways by which microplastics move through marine food webs and the potential physiological harm to upper-trophic predators.

Article Tier 2

Physiological and Toxicological Effects of Nano/Microplastics on Marine Birds

This chapter reviews the physiological and toxicological effects of nano/microplastics on marine seabirds, which are recognized as bioindicators for plastic pollution due to their role as apex predators and their extensive exposure through foraging. The authors document starvation, reproductive failure, diminished body weight, and tissue damage in seabirds from plastic ingestion, calling for improved waste management policies to reduce plastic accumulation in marine environments.

Article Tier 2

Recommendation: Environmental toxicology of marine microplastic pollution — R1/PR8

This review synthesises a decade of research on how microplastics harm marine organisms across multiple trophic levels, from phytoplankton and zooplankton to bivalves and fish. It highlights that microplastics cause damage at molecular, biochemical, and physiological levels, and that they also act as vectors for chemical pollutants, amplifying environmental risks throughout marine food webs.

Share this paper