We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Macro and microplastic intake in seafood variates by the marine organism's feeding behaviour: Is it a concern to human health?
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers examined microplastic contamination across 26 species of fish, mollusks, and crustaceans from Portuguese waters and found plastic fragments in over 70 percent of specimens. The type and amount of contamination varied with each species' feeding behavior, with bottom-feeding organisms generally ingesting more particles. Importantly, no evidence of microplastic transfer from the digestive tract to muscle tissue was found, though the study notes that consuming whole organisms like shellfish still poses an exposure risk.
Seafood is considered one of the healthiest sources of food intake for humans, mainly because of its high protein content. However, oceans are among the most polluted environments, and microplastics have been widely reported to be ingested, absorbed or bioaccumulated by marine organisms. The different feeding behaviour may contribute to infer the amounts of microplastic particles accidently intake by marine organisms. We investigated the putative levels of microplastics in different edible species of fish, molluscs, and crustaceans. Plastic fragments larger than 200 μm were detected in the digestive tract of 277 out of 390 specimens (71.5 ± 22.2%) of the 26 different species analysed. There was no evidence of microplastic translocation or bioaccumulation in the muscle tissue of fish, molluscs, and crustaceans. Organisms with carnivorous feeding habits had the highest prevalence of plastic ingestion (79 ± 9.4%), followed by planktivorous species (74 ± 15.5%), and detritivorous species (38 ± 36.9%), suggesting a transfer through the food chain. Moreover, we found evidence that species with less selective feeding habits may be the most affected by the ingestion of large microplastic particles. Our results provide further evidence to the ubiquitous presence of microplastics in marine organisms representing a direct threat to marine wildlife, and to human health with potential consequences for future generations according to the One Health initiatives approach.
More Papers Like This
Do microplastic contaminated seafood consumption pose a potential risk to human health?
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers mapped microplastic presence in commercially important marine species including mussels, clams, crabs, and fish from the Ria Formosa lagoon and south coast of Portugal. They found microplastics in the gastrointestinal tracts of all species examined, with fibers and fragments being the most common types. The study raises questions about the potential health implications of consuming microplastic-contaminated seafood, though more research is needed to fully assess the risk.
Microplastic contamination in marine mussels from the Atlantic coast of North Portugal and human risk of microplastic intake through mussel consumption
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers analyzed wild mussels from Portugal's Atlantic coast and found microplastics in all samples, with an average of about 1.6 particles per gram of mussel tissue. Based on typical Portuguese seafood consumption patterns, the estimated annual human intake of microplastics from mussels alone was calculated, highlighting that regular shellfish consumers face meaningful microplastic exposure through their diet.
Microplastics ingestion by marine fauna with a particular focus on commercial species: a systematic review
AI summary Read the abstract
This systematic review and meta-analysis examines microplastic ingestion across marine species, with a focus on commercially important seafood. The researchers found that microplastic contamination is widespread in fish, shellfish, and other marine animals that end up on our dinner plates. This matters for human health because we may be consuming these particles every time we eat seafood.
Assessing the bioaccumulation of microplastics in commercially important fish species
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers assessed microplastic accumulation in commercially important fish species from coastal and offshore waters, finding significant differences between species based on feeding strategies and habitat depth. Filter feeders and omnivorous species accumulated more microplastics than others, reflecting diet-based differences across trophic levels. The study raises concerns about human dietary exposure to microplastics through widely consumed seafood products.
Microplastic burden in marine benthic invertebrates depends on species traits and feeding ecology within biogeographical provinces
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers analyzed microplastic levels in the bodies of marine bottom-dwelling invertebrates across different ocean regions and found that the amount of microplastic ingested depended more on the animals' feeding strategies and body traits than on local pollution levels alone. Filter-feeding and deposit-feeding species accumulated the most particles. The study suggests that simply measuring environmental microplastic concentrations may not accurately predict how much wildlife in an area is actually ingesting.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.