0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Application of implementation science framework to develop and adopt regulatory science in different national regulatory authorities

Frontiers in Public Health 2023 8 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Junnan Shi, Xianwen Chen, Hao Hu, Carolina Oi Lam Ung

Summary

This paper is not relevant to microplastics; it discusses applying implementation science frameworks to help national regulatory authorities develop and adopt evidence-based decision-making practices.

The application of the implementation science framework is useful for conceptualizing and planning the development and adoption of RS for evidence-based regulatory decision-making. Continuous commitment to the RS development and regular review of the RS goals by the decision-makers are important for DRAs to meet the ever-changing scientific challenges in their regulatory decision-making process.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Use of scientific evidence to inform environmental health policies and governance strategies at the local level

Researchers examined how scientific evidence informs environmental health policies at the local governance level, finding gaps between available research on emerging contaminants like microplastics and their translation into effective regulatory strategies.

Article Tier 2

Navigating spaces between conservation research and practice: Are we making progress?

This review examined progress in bridging the gap between conservation research and conservation practice over a decade, finding persistent mismatches remain between scientific findings and field implementation. While not directly about microplastics, this methodological discussion is relevant to applying research on plastic pollution impacts to real-world policy and management decisions.

Article Tier 2

Diagnosing the governance gap: Technically informed public perception and institutional trust in microplastic regulation in Costa Rica

A national survey of 168 science, health, and policy professionals in Costa Rica assessed awareness and risk perceptions of microplastics, finding high technical awareness but identifying a significant governance gap between scientific knowledge and institutional capacity for regulation.

Article Tier 2

The emergence of microplastics: charting the path from research to regulations

This study summarized recent groundbreaking microplastic research and emerging regulations, charting the path from scientific discovery to policy action and providing recommendations to overcome remaining regulatory barriers.

Article Tier 2

Environmental Management Systems and Microplastic Pollution: Bridging Science, Policy, and Practice

This review examined how environmental management systems can be applied to address microplastic pollution, bridging the gap between scientific research, corporate practice, and regulatory policy. The authors found that voluntary management frameworks and ISO-aligned approaches offer practical pathways for industry to reduce microplastic emissions, though mandatory regulatory standards are ultimately needed for systemic change.

Share this paper