We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Sampling and Detection of Microplastics in the Atmosphere
Summary
This chapter reviews how airborne microplastics are collected and identified, covering both passive methods (like deposition traps) and active sampling, along with analytical techniques such as FTIR spectroscopy and Raman spectroscopy. Standardizing these methods is critical for accurately measuring human exposure through inhalation — currently one of the least understood routes of microplastic entry into the body.
The abundance of microplastics around the globe has seriously threatened living organisms from soils to aquatic systems. Microplastics have been detected in the digestive tracts of various animals. Even indoor dust has been reported as a undeniable source of microplastic exposure for humans. Commonly, plastic particles with sizes ranging between 5 and 100 nm are considered microplastics. Microplastics are broadly divided into two categories: primary and secondary. Primary microplastics are deliberately produced for particular applications (like microbeads used in cosmetics), and secondary microplastics are generated through fragmentation of macroplastics (e.g. fibres) due to degradation. To assess and identify microplastics in the atmosphere, a number of sampling methods (both active and passive) and various modern detection techniques (such as thermochemical methods, Fourier transform infrared [FTIR], Raman spectroscopy, GC–MS, etc.) have been employed. This chapter discusses the present state of knowledge about atmospheric microplastics, sample collection methods, and important detection and analytical techniques.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
A review of airborne micro- and nano-plastics: Sampling methods, analytical techniques, and exposure risks.
This review of 140 articles on airborne micro- and nanoplastics found that diverse sampling and analytical methods make cross-study comparisons difficult, limiting exposure risk assessment. The authors recommend standardization of methods and highlight that active samplers and FTIR/Raman spectroscopy are the most commonly used approaches for collecting and identifying atmospheric plastic particles.
Microplastics in Urban Ambient Air: A Rapid Review of Active Sampling and Analytical Methods for Human Risk Assessment
This review evaluated methods for sampling and analyzing microplastics in outdoor urban air to assess human health risks. Active air sampling combined with advanced techniques like micro-Raman spectroscopy can measure the smallest inhalable particles, which are most relevant to health. The authors found that fibers are the most common airborne microplastic and stress that better standardized methods are needed to understand how much microplastic people actually breathe in.
Characterization of Microplastics in the Atmosphere
This study measured microplastic concentrations in the atmosphere using active and passive sampling to understand airborne transport pathways. Given that inhaling airborne microplastics is an underappreciated human exposure route, characterizing atmospheric plastic levels and transport is important for estimating total human exposure.
Critical steps for microplastics characterization from the atmosphere
This systematic review of atmospheric microplastic sampling and characterization methodologies finds that divergent results across studies stem from inconsistent collection and pre-treatment methods, and that the choice of characterization technique (FTIR vs. Raman) should be matched to the MPs' origin and environmental matrix.
Analytical Challenges and Strategies for Particle-Based Analysis of Airborne Micro(nano)plastics in Size-Fractionated Samples Using Microscopy, SEM/EDX, and Raman Spectroscopy
This review covered analytical strategies for characterizing airborne microplastics as particles, addressing sampling challenges, detection methods including spectroscopy, and the importance of particle-level analysis for accurate exposure assessment. It identified key methodological gaps and recommended standardization approaches.