We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Biomonitoring for Watershed Protection from a Multiscale Land-Use Perspective
Summary
This review of freshwater biomonitoring studies examined how different land use types affect aquatic organisms across temporal and spatial scales, finding that land use intensity strongly influences bioindicator responses and recommending that biomonitoring programs consider multiple scales and eDNA approaches.
The types and intensification of land use in the watershed affect the living organisms in aquatic ecosystems differently; this impact will also vary according to temporal and spatial scales. Understanding these interactions is crucial in the design of biomonitoring programs to detect the effect of different pollutants in freshwater ecosystems and improve watershed management and conservation strategies. Therefore, this paper qualitatively reviews biomonitoring studies in freshwater ecosystems to evaluate the impact of different land use types on multiple scales in watersheds. The paper is organized into four sections. The first section presents biomonitoring in different freshwater systems (streams, rivers, lakes, and reservoirs). In the second section, we describe the biomonitoring characteristics of the main land use types. In the third section, we explain how spatial and temporal scales affect biomonitoring. Finally, in the fourth section, we focus on biomonitoring planning and future prediction and discuss how to design biomonitoring programs and how to use models and eDNA in biomonitoring. Our review will assist in decision-making regarding biomonitoring programs in watersheds and will guide future studies on the different bioindicators for various land use types in diverse ecosystems worldwide.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Assessment of biomarker-based ecotoxic effects in combating microplastic pollution - A review
This review examined the use of biomarker-based ecotoxicological approaches to assess the impacts of microplastic pollution across marine, freshwater, and terrestrial organisms. The authors argue that standardized biomarker frameworks are needed to quantify ecological harm from microplastics more effectively.
Field validated biomarker (ValidBIO) based assessment of impacts of various pollutants in water
This review examines field-validated biomarker approaches for monitoring water pollution, showing that enzymatic activity changes in fish exposed to heavy metals, pesticides, microplastics, and persistent organic pollutants serve as sensitive and reliable indicators of aquatic contamination across diverse environments.
Aquatic biomonitoring: Importance, challenges, and limitations
This review examined aquatic biomonitoring approaches for detecting micropollutants including pesticides, pharmaceuticals, metals, and microplastics, discussing methodological challenges in capturing real-world exposure effects across diverse regional environmental conditions. The authors highlighted the importance of combining laboratory toxicity studies with in-situ monitoring to better predict risks from individual and mixed contaminants in Latin American ecosystems.
Impacts of land use/land cover on water quality: a contemporary review for researchers and policymakers
This review examines how different land uses, from farming to urban development, affect water quality through diffuse pollution. Natural vegetation acts as a protective buffer against contamination, but more research is needed to determine how much vegetation is required to effectively filter pollutants. The findings are relevant to microplastic pollution because urban runoff and agricultural land use are major pathways by which microplastics enter drinking water sources.
Current Status of Omics in Biological Quality Elements for Freshwater Biomonitoring
This review examines how advanced molecular techniques like DNA barcoding, environmental DNA analysis, and metagenomics are being applied to freshwater biomonitoring alongside traditional biological assessment methods. Researchers found that these omics-based approaches can provide faster, more comprehensive biodiversity assessments than conventional methods, but significant challenges remain in standardizing protocols and interpreting results. The study highlights how these tools could improve the detection of ecosystem impacts from emerging threats including microplastic pollution.