0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Human Health Effects Sign in to save

Individual Exposure to Microplastics through the Inhalation Route: Comparison of Microplastics in Inhaled Indoor Aerosol and Exhaled Breath Air

Environmental Science & Technology Letters 2023 54 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Geng Yang, Zhichun Zhang, Wei Zhou, Xuehua Shao, Zhaofen Li, Ying Zhou

Summary

In a study of 30 volunteers in Shanghai, researchers measured microplastics in both the indoor air people breathed in and the air they exhaled. They found an average of 43 microplastic particles per cubic meter in inhaled air but only 12 in exhaled breath, suggesting that a significant portion of inhaled microplastics are retained in the respiratory system. This is one of the first studies to directly quantify how much airborne microplastic people actually absorb through breathing.

Body Systems
Models

Human exposure to microplastics (MPs), especially from indoor air, has aroused growing public concern, but very little is known about the assessment of individual MPs inhalation exposure. In this study, a total of 30 volunteers were recruited from Shanghai, China. Both human inhaled indoor aerosol (HIA) and human exhaled breath (HEB) samples were pairwise collected for each participant and analyzed through micro-Raman imaging spectroscopy. MPs were detected in all samples, averaging 43 ± 16 (range of 11–92) items/m3 for HIA and 12 ± 5 (range of 3–28) items/m3 for HEB. Moreover, the dominant components in all samples were small fragment- and fiber-shaped MPs. It is estimated that the daily intake of HIA was roughly 704 ± 254 MPs items, most of which would deposited in the airway with 526 ± 203 MPs items, whereas 178 ± 75 MPs items could be daily discharged via HEB. The actual daily inhalation exposure of MPs could be overestimated by 1.33 times with the HIA-based approach and by 1.40 times for smaller MPs (<10 μm). These results suggest that integration of HIA and HEB should be considered when evaluating individual MPs exposure via respiration.

Share this paper