We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
The need for environmentally realistic studies on the health effects of terrestrial microplastics
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers reviewed 114 studies on the health effects of microplastics in laboratory rodents and found that most experiments used concentrations and plastic types that do not reflect what animals and humans actually encounter in the real world. The plastic types, sizes, and doses used in lab settings often differ substantially from environmental conditions. The study calls for more environmentally realistic research designs to generate data that can meaningfully inform health risk assessments for terrestrial species, including humans.
UNLABELLED: Plastic pollution is now so widespread that microplastics are regularly detected in biological samples surveyed for their presence. Despite their pervasiveness, very little is known about the effects of microplastics on the health of terrestrial vertebrates. While emerging studies are showing that microplastics represent a potentially serious threat to animal health, data have been limited to in vivo studies on laboratory rodents that were force fed plastics. The extent to which these studies are representative of the conditions that animals and humans might actually experience in the real world is largely unknown. Here, we review 114 papers from the peer-reviewed literature in order to understand how the concentrations and types of microplastics being administered to rodents in lab studies compare to those found in terrestrial soils. From 73 in vivo lab studies, and 41 soil studies, we found that lab studies have heretofore fed rodents microplastics at concentrations that were hundreds of thousands of times greater than they would be exposed to in nature. Furthermore, health effects have been studied for only 20% of the microplastic polymers that are known to occur in soils. Plastic pollution is arguably one of the most pressing ecological and public health issues of our time, yet existing lab-based research on the health effects of terrestrial microplastics does not reflect the conditions that free-ranging vertebrates are actually experiencing. Going forward, performing more true-to-life research will be of the utmost importance to fully understand the impacts of microplastics and maintain the public's faith in the scientific process. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43591-023-00059-1.
More Papers Like This
The need for ecologically realistic studies on the health effects of microplastics
AI summary Read the abstract
This perspective argues that current laboratory studies on microplastic health effects — which rely on force-feeding rodents unrealistically high doses — poorly represent actual wildlife or human exposures, calling for more ecologically realistic study designs to generate meaningful risk data.
Microplastic exposure studies should be environmentally realistic
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers argue that many laboratory studies on microplastic effects use concentrations far higher than what is actually found in the environment, which can lead to misleading conclusions about real-world risks. They call for experiments that better reflect environmental conditions, including realistic particle sizes, shapes, and concentrations. The study emphasizes that more environmentally relevant research is needed to accurately assess the true ecological threat of microplastic pollution.
Reflection on the utilization of microplastics as experiment material in laboratory
AI summary Read the abstract
This perspective paper analyzed 204 microplastics toxicology studies and found significant mismatches between the types of microplastics used as experimental materials and those actually found in the environment. The authors argue that using ecologically unrealistic plastic types and concentrations in lab experiments limits the ability to draw meaningful conclusions about real-world risks.
Microplastics and nanoplastics toxicity assays: A revision towards to environmental-relevance in water environment
AI summary Read the abstract
This review evaluates how well current laboratory toxicity tests for micro and nanoplastics reflect real-world conditions in water environments. The authors found that most studies use pristine plastic particles at concentrations far higher than what is found in nature, limiting the relevance of their findings. The paper calls for more environmentally realistic testing approaches to better understand the actual risks of plastic particle pollution.
Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future?
AI summary Read the abstract
This review critically evaluates published research on microplastic effects on aquatic organisms and identifies significant gaps between laboratory experiments and real-world conditions. Researchers found that most studies use polystyrene spheres at concentrations far higher than those found in the environment, while the most common microplastics in nature are fragments and fibers of other polymer types. The study calls for more environmentally realistic experimental designs to better understand the actual ecological risks of microplastic pollution.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.