0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Sign in to save

The need for environmentally realistic studies on the health effects of terrestrial microplastics

Microplastics and Nanoplastics 2023 21 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 55 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Michael Noonan, Michael Noonan, C. Lauren Mills, C. Lauren Mills, C. Lauren Mills, C. Lauren Mills, Joy Savanagouder, Joy Savanagouder, Joy Savanagouder, Joy Savanagouder, C. Lauren Mills, C. Lauren Mills, C. Lauren Mills, C. Lauren Mills, Marcia de Almeida Monteiro Melo Ferraz Marcia de Almeida Monteiro Melo Ferraz Michael Noonan, Marcia de Almeida Monteiro Melo Ferraz Marcia de Almeida Monteiro Melo Ferraz Marcia de Almeida Monteiro Melo Ferraz Michael Noonan, Michael Noonan, Michael Noonan, Michael Noonan, Michael Noonan, Michael Noonan, Michael Noonan, Michael Noonan, Michael Noonan, Marcia de Almeida Monteiro Melo Ferraz Marcia de Almeida Monteiro Melo Ferraz Marcia de Almeida Monteiro Melo Ferraz

Summary

Researchers reviewed 114 studies on the health effects of microplastics in laboratory rodents and found that most experiments used concentrations and plastic types that do not reflect what animals and humans actually encounter in the real world. The plastic types, sizes, and doses used in lab settings often differ substantially from environmental conditions. The study calls for more environmentally realistic research designs to generate data that can meaningfully inform health risk assessments for terrestrial species, including humans.

Study Type In vivo

UNLABELLED: Plastic pollution is now so widespread that microplastics are regularly detected in biological samples surveyed for their presence. Despite their pervasiveness, very little is known about the effects of microplastics on the health of terrestrial vertebrates. While emerging studies are showing that microplastics represent a potentially serious threat to animal health, data have been limited to in vivo studies on laboratory rodents that were force fed plastics. The extent to which these studies are representative of the conditions that animals and humans might actually experience in the real world is largely unknown. Here, we review 114 papers from the peer-reviewed literature in order to understand how the concentrations and types of microplastics being administered to rodents in lab studies compare to those found in terrestrial soils. From 73 in vivo lab studies, and 41 soil studies, we found that lab studies have heretofore fed rodents microplastics at concentrations that were hundreds of thousands of times greater than they would be exposed to in nature. Furthermore, health effects have been studied for only 20% of the microplastic polymers that are known to occur in soils. Plastic pollution is arguably one of the most pressing ecological and public health issues of our time, yet existing lab-based research on the health effects of terrestrial microplastics does not reflect the conditions that free-ranging vertebrates are actually experiencing. Going forward, performing more true-to-life research will be of the utmost importance to fully understand the impacts of microplastics and maintain the public's faith in the scientific process. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43591-023-00059-1.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper