0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Remediation Sign in to save

Impact of vented and condenser tumble dryers on waterborne and airborne microfiber pollution

PLoS ONE 2023 12 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Amber M. Cummins, Adam K. Malekpour, A. J. Smith, Suzanne Lonsdale, John R. Dean, Neil J. Lant

Summary

Tumble dryers are a significant and underappreciated source of microfiber pollution: vented dryers release microfibers into outdoor air through their exhaust ducts, while condenser dryers discharge them into wastewater when users rinse out lint filters. The study found that real consumer laundry loads released surprisingly high total microfiber levels (over 340 ppm) across both dryer types. This means household drying is an important missing piece in efforts to curb textile microfiber pollution, alongside the more studied problem of washing machine emissions.

Laundering of textiles is a significant source of waterborne microfiber pollution, and solutions are now being sought to mitigate this issue including improvements in clothing technology and integration of filtration systems into washing machines. Vented tumble dryers are a potential source of airborne microfiber pollution, as their built-in lint filtration systems have been found to be inefficient with significant quantities of textile microfibers being released to the external environment through their exhaust air ducts. The present study is the first to evaluate the impact of condenser dryers, finding that they are significant contributors to waterborne microfiber pollution from the lint filter (if users clean this with water), the condenser and the condensed water. Microfiber release from drying of real consumer loads in condenser and vented tumble dryers was compared, finding that real loads release surprisingly high levels of microfibers (total 341.5 ± 126.0 ppm for those dried in a condenser dryer and 256.0 ± 74.2 ppm for those dried in a vented dryer), similar in quantity to microfibers produced during the first highly-shedding drying cycle of a new T-shirt load (total 321.4 ± 11.2 ppm) in a condenser dryer. Vented dryers were found to be significant contributors to waterborne microfiber pollution if consumers clean the lint filter with water in accordance with some published appliance usage instructions, as most (86.1 ± 5.5% for the real consumer loads tested) of the microfibers generated during vented tumble drying were collected on the lint filter. Therefore, tumble dryers are a significant source of waterborne and (for vented dryers) airborne microfiber pollution. While reducing the pore size of tumble dryer lint filters and instructing consumers to dispose of fibers collected on lint filters as municipal solid waste could help reduce the issue, more sophisticated engineering solutions will likely be required to achieve a more comprehensive solution.

Share this paper