We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comparative analysis of the effects of conventional and biodegradable plastic mulching films on soil-peanut ecology and soil pollution
AI summary Read the abstract
A three-year field study comparing conventional and biodegradable plastic mulch on peanut farms found that conventional plastic improved crop yield by 10.77%, soil nutrients, and beneficial bacterial communities compared to biodegradable alternatives, but left significantly more plastic residue in the soil.
In agricultural production, biodegradable plastic mulching film (Bio-PMF) has the potential to replace conventional plastic mulching film (CPMF) due to its degradability, but their impacts on soil-crop ecology are controversial. In this study, from 2019 to 2021, effects of CPMF and Bio-PMF on the soil-crop ecology and soil pollution were evaluated on a peanut farm. Compared to the Bio-PMF, an overall improvement in the soil-peanut ecology under the CPMF was observed, including an increase of 10.77 ± 4.8% in peanut yield, an amelioration of four soil physicochemical properties (total P and available P in the flowering stage, total P and temperature in the mature stage), an increase of rhizobacterial relative abundances in class level (Bacteroidia, Blastocatellia, Thermoleophilia and Vicinamibacteria in the flowering stage, Nitrospira and Bacilli in the mature stage) and genus level (RB41 and Bacillus in the flowering stage, Bacillus and Dongia in the mature stage), and an enhancement of soil nitrogen metabolism abilities (ureolysis, nitrification and aerobic ammonia in the flowering stage, nitrate reduction and nitrite ammonification in the mature stage). These preserved soil nutrients and temperature, reshaped rhizobacterial communities, and enhanced soil nitrogen metabolism abilities in the mature stage were obviously correlated with peanut yield under CPMF. However, such remarkable relations were not existed under Bio-PMF. In addition, compared with Bio-PMF, CPMF significantly increased the contents of dimethyl phthalate (DMP), diethyl phthalate (DEP), dibutyl phthalate (DBP) and microplastics (MPs) in soil by 79.93, 44.55, 138.72 and 14.1%, respectively. Thus, CPMF improved soil-peanut ecology and caused serious soil pollution, while Bio-PMF introduced little pollutants into the soil and had little impact on soil-peanut ecology. Based on these, the degradation ability of CPMF or the ecological improvement capacity of Bio-PMF should be improved to obtain the environmentally and soil-crop ecology friendly plastic film in the future.
More Papers Like This
Multi-Criteria Economic and Environmental Assessment of Biodegradable and Plastic Mulch Films in Peanut Production Systems
AI summary Read the abstract
A three-year field trial in Shandong, China compared plastic and biodegradable mulch films on peanut crops, measuring crop yield, costs, and leftover film in soil. All mulch types increased yields versus no mulch, and biodegradable films cost slightly more but left comparable or less visible residue. Microplastics themselves were not measured directly.
Response of peanut plant and soil N-fixing bacterial communities to conventional and biodegradable microplastics
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers tested how conventional plastics (polyethylene and polystyrene) and a biodegradable plastic (polylactic acid) affect peanut plant growth and nitrogen-fixing soil bacteria. They found that while none of the plastics reduced plant biomass, the biodegradable PLA at high doses dramatically altered soil nitrogen levels and bacterial community composition. The study suggests that biodegradable plastics may not be as harmless to agricultural soil ecosystems as commonly assumed.
Effects of Biodegradable Film Mulching on Bacterial Diversity in Soils
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared bacterial diversity in soils mulched with biodegradable plastic films, conventional plastic films, and bare soil, finding that biodegradable films altered microbial community composition differently than conventional plastics. The results are relevant to evaluating whether biodegradable agricultural films truly reduce soil microbiome disruption compared to persistent plastic mulches.
Biodegradable and conventional mulches inhibit nitrogen fixation by peanut root nodules – potentially related to microplastics in the soil
AI summary Read the abstract
A four-year mulching experiment with peanuts found that both conventional polyethylene and biodegradable (PLA-PBAT) plastic mulches reduced root nodule nitrogen fixation by 54–59%, with microplastics from the mulch films likely contributing to this suppression. Since biological nitrogen fixation is a key natural process that reduces the need for synthetic fertilizers, this finding suggests that agricultural plastic use may have hidden costs for soil fertility and farming sustainability.
Comparative impacts of polyethylene and biodegradable film residues on soil microbial communities and rapeseed performance under field conditions
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared polyethylene and biodegradable plastic film residues in agricultural soil under field conditions, finding that conventional film residues did not significantly affect rapeseed productivity, while biodegradable films better preserved soil microbial functions and fertility. The study highlights the need for long-term monitoring to guide optimal plastic film use in agriculture.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.