0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Impact of disposable mask microplastics pollution on the aquatic environment and microalgae growth

Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2023 18 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 55 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Adian Khoironi, Hadiyanto Hadiyanto, Eko Hartini, Inggar Dianratri, Falvocha Alifsmara Joelyna, Wahyu Zuli Pratiwi

Summary

Researchers investigated how discarded disposable face masks release microplastics into freshwater environments over a three-month period. They found that mask materials shed microplastic fibers that degraded water quality and negatively affected the growth of Chlorella microalgae. The study highlights that improperly disposed pandemic-related mask waste is a meaningful source of microplastic pollution in aquatic ecosystems.

The COVID-19 pandemic has mandated people to use medical masks to protect the public. However the improper management of disposable mask waste has led to the increase of marine pollution, in terms of water quality, and the decline in aquatic microorganisms. The aim of this research was to investigate the impact of disposable mask waste on fresh water and microalgae biomass quality. Disposable masks (untreated or treated with Enterococcus faecalis) were placed in 10-L glass reactors containing fresh water or water containing algal Chlorella sp. and its growth supplements (Chlorella medium) (four 10-L reactors in total) and kept in controlled conditions for 3 months. Water and biomass yield quality were evaluated using water quality analysis, spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and proximate lipid and protein analysis. Disposable masks, incubated in either fresh water or Chlorella medium, affected several water quality parameters such as chemical oxygen demand (COD), biological oxygen demand (BOD), dissolved oxygen (DO), and pH. Microplastic identification revealed that some fibers were present in the water following a 100-day treatment process. Fourier transform-infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analysis was used to determine the change in important, organic functional groups and highlighted the disappearance of a peak at 1530 cm corresponding to the primary protein (C-N) and the appearance of new peaks at 1651 cm and 1270 cm corresponding to methyl alcohol (CHOH) and ketone (C = O), respectively. This indicated the detrimental effect of disposable mask fragmentation on the biomass quality. The SEM investigation has shown a damage to the surface membrane of Chlorella sp. cells. Altogether, disposable masks decreased the water quality and damaged microalgae by inhibiting their growth. Therefore, the disposable mask contaminated by various microbes, after being used by a human, may be one of the most dangerous hazards to the environment.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Unmasking effects of masks: Microplastics released from disposable surgical face masks induce toxic effects in microalgae Scenedesmus obliquus and Chlorella sp.

Researchers found that microplastics released from disposable surgical face masks induced toxic effects in two microalgae species, with the outer mask layer releasing the most particles and causing measurable harm to algal growth and photosynthesis.

Article Tier 2

Surgical face masks as a potential source for microplastic pollution in the COVID-19 scenario

Researchers investigated how disposable surgical face masks, widely used during the COVID-19 pandemic, could become a significant new source of microplastic pollution. The study notes that masks made of polymeric materials can release microplastic fibers into aquatic environments where they may be ingested by fish and other organisms. The findings suggest that face mask waste deserves focused attention as a microplastic source, including better waste management systems.

Article Tier 2

Potential of Freshwater Microalgae in Biodegradation of Disposable Face Masks

Researchers investigated whether freshwater microalgae could biodegrade disposable face masks — a major source of pandemic plastic waste — measuring plastic weight loss and surface degradation under algal cultures. Selected algal species showed measurable degradation of mask fibers, suggesting a biological treatment pathway.

Article Tier 2

Uncovering the release of micro/nanoplastics from disposable face masks at times of COVID-19

Researchers investigated how disposable face masks release micro- and nanoplastics when exposed to mechanical stress in water, simulating environmental weathering. They found that even minimal deterioration of a single mask could release thousands of microplastic fibers and up to ten billion nanoscale particles. The study provides the first quantitative evidence of how pandemic-related mask waste may contribute to plastic pollution in aquatic ecosystems.

Article Tier 2

Used disposable face masks are significant sources of microplastics to environment

Researchers evaluated whether disposable face masks release microplastics into water and found that used masks released significantly more particles than new ones, increasing from about 183 particles per piece for new masks to much higher levels after use. The study suggests that the massive increase in disposable mask consumption during the COVID-19 pandemic has made improperly discarded masks a significant new source of microplastic pollution.

Share this paper