0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Food & Water Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

When microplastics are not plastic: Chemical characterization of environmental microfibers using stimulated Raman microspectroscopy

The Science of The Total Environment 2023 25 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 55 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Fadiyah M. Baalkhuyur, Cecilia Martin, Fadiyah M. Baalkhuyur, Fadiyah M. Baalkhuyur, Cecilia Martin, Sergey P. Laptenok, Fadiyah M. Baalkhuyur, Luca Genchi, Luca Genchi, Luca Genchi, Cecilia Martin, Carlos M. Duarte Cecilia Martin, Fadiyah M. Baalkhuyur, Fadiyah M. Baalkhuyur, Sergey P. Laptenok, Sergey P. Laptenok, Cecilia Martin, Cecilia Martin, Fadiyah M. Baalkhuyur, Fadiyah M. Baalkhuyur, Fadiyah M. Baalkhuyur, Fadiyah M. Baalkhuyur, Cecilia Martin, Fadiyah M. Baalkhuyur, Fadiyah M. Baalkhuyur, Carlos M. Duarte Cecilia Martin, Carlos M. Duarte Carlos M. Duarte Cecilia Martin, Cecilia Martin, Luca Genchi, Luca Genchi, Sergey P. Laptenok, Sergey P. Laptenok, Cecilia Martin, Carlos M. Duarte Cecilia Martin, Sergey P. Laptenok, Carlos M. Duarte Sergey P. Laptenok, Carlo Liberale, Cecilia Martin, Cecilia Martin, Carlos M. Duarte Fadiyah M. Baalkhuyur, Carlos M. Duarte Carlos M. Duarte Fadiyah M. Baalkhuyur, Carlos M. Duarte Fadiyah M. Baalkhuyur, Carlos M. Duarte Carlos M. Duarte Fadiyah M. Baalkhuyur, Carlos M. Duarte Carlos M. Duarte Carlos M. Duarte Carlos M. Duarte Carlos M. Duarte Carlo Liberale, Carlo Liberale, Carlo Liberale, Carlos M. Duarte Carlo Liberale, Cecilia Martin, Carlos M. Duarte Carlos M. Duarte Carlos M. Duarte Carlos M. Duarte Carlos M. Duarte Carlo Liberale, Carlos M. Duarte Carlo Liberale, Carlos M. Duarte Carlos M. Duarte Carlos M. Duarte

Summary

Researchers used advanced Raman microscopy to determine whether microfibers found in various marine environments are actually made of plastic. They found that roughly three-quarters of environmental microfibers are natural materials like cotton or cellulose rather than synthetic polymers. The study suggests that many previous estimates of microplastic fiber pollution may have significantly overcounted by misidentifying natural fibers as plastic.

Models
Study Type Environmental

The abundance of anthropogenic debris dispersed in the environment is exponentially growing, raising concerns about marine life and human exposure to microplastics. Microfibers are the most abundant microplastic type in the environment. However, recent research suggests that most microfibers dispersed in the environment are not made of synthetic polymers. In this work, we systematically tested this assumption by determining the man-made or natural origin of microfibers found in different environments, including surface waters, sediments at depths >5000 m and highly sensitive habitats like mangroves and seagrass, and treated water using stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) microscopy. Our findings show that ¾<sup>th</sup> of analyzed microfibers are of natural origin. One plastic fiber is estimated per every 50 L in surface seawater, every 5 L in desalinated drinking water, every 3 g in deep sea sediments and every 27 g in coastal sediments. Synthetic fibers were significantly larger in surface seawaters compared to organic fibers due to higher resistance to solar radiation. These results emphasize the necessity of using spectroscopical methods to assess the origin of environmental microfibers to accurately estimate the abundance of synthetic materials in the environment.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper