0
Meta Analysis ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 1 ? Systematic review or meta-analysis. Synthesizes findings across many studies. Strongest evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

Have genetic targets for faecal pollution diagnostics and source tracking revolutionized water quality analysis yet?

FEMS Microbiology Reviews 2023 48 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 70 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Katalin Demeter, Margaret E. Stevenson, Margaret E. Stevenson, Margaret E. Stevenson, Margaret E. Stevenson, Rita Linke, Elisenda Ballesté, Warish Ahmed, Alexander K. T. Kirschner, Elisenda Ballesté, Alexander K. T. Kirschner, Georg H. Reischer, René Mayer, Julia Derx, Margaret E. Stevenson, Julia Vierheilig, Claudia Kolm, Joan B. Rose, Elisenda Ballesté, Elisenda Ballesté, Margaret E. Stevenson, Julia Derx, Alexander K. T. Kirschner, Regina Sommer, Orin C. Shanks, Anicet R. Blanch, Joan B. Rose, Warish Ahmed, Andreas H. Farnleitner

Summary

This analysis of over 1,100 publications establishes genetic faecal pollution diagnostics as a distinct scientific discipline that has transformed water quality analysis over the past 30 years. PCR and sequencing methods have enabled precise identification of faecal contamination sources in water, a major advance over traditional culture-based methods.

Study Type Review

The impacts of nucleic acid-based methods - such as PCR and sequencing - to detect and analyze indicators, genetic markers or molecular signatures of microbial faecal pollution in health-related water quality research were assessed by rigorous literature analysis. A wide range of application areas and study designs has been identified since the first application more than 30 years ago (>1100 publications). Given the consistency of methods and assessment types, we suggest defining this emerging part of science as a new discipline: genetic faecal pollution diagnostics (GFPD) in health-related microbial water quality analysis. Undoubtedly, GFPD has already revolutionized faecal pollution detection (i.e., traditional or alternative general faecal indicator/marker analysis) and microbial source tracking (i.e., host-associated faecal indicator/marker analysis), the current core applications. GFPD is also expanding to many other research areas, including infection and health risk assessment, evaluation of microbial water treatment, and support of wastewater surveillance. In addition, storage of DNA extracts allows for biobanking, which opens up new perspectives. The tools of GFPD can be combined with cultivation-based standardized faecal indicator enumeration, pathogen detection, and various environmental data types, in an integrated data analysis approach. This comprehensive meta-analysis provides the scientific status quo of this field, including trend analyses and literature statistics, outlining identified application areas, and discusses the benefits and challenges of nucleic acid-based analysis in GFPD.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper