0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Human Health Effects Nanoplastics Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Machine learning-driven QSAR models for predicting the mixture toxicity of nanoparticles

Environment International 2023 63 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 65 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Fan Zhang, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Fan Zhang, Fan Zhang, Fan Zhang, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Zhuang Wang, Fan Zhang, Zhuang Wang, Fan Zhang, Zhuang Wang, Zhuang Wang, Zhuang Wang, Zhuang Wang, Zhuang Wang, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Zhuang Wang, Zhuang Wang, Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Zhuang Wang, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Martina G. Vijver Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Zhuang Wang, Zhuang Wang, Zhuang Wang, Zhuang Wang, Fan Zhang, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Martina G. Vijver Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Fan Zhang, Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Martina G. Vijver Zhuang Wang, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Zhuang Wang, Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Martina G. Vijver Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Martina G. Vijver Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Martina G. Vijver Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Martina G. Vijver Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Martina G. Vijver Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Martina G. Vijver Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Martina G. Vijver Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Martina G. Vijver Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Martina G. Vijver Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Martina G. Vijver Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver

Summary

Researchers used machine learning to predict how toxic different mixtures of metal nanoparticles are to bacteria. Their models outperformed traditional methods at predicting combined toxicity effects. While focused on engineered nanoparticles rather than microplastics, the computational approach could be adapted to predict health risks from the complex mixtures of nano-sized pollutants people encounter.

Body Systems

Research on theoretical prediction methods for the mixture toxicity of engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) faces significant challenges. The application of in silico methods based on machine learning is emerging as an effective strategy to address the toxicity prediction of chemical mixtures. Herein, we combined toxicity data generated in our lab with experimental data reported in the literature to predict the combined toxicity of seven metallic ENPs for Escherichia coli at different mixing ratios (22 binary combinations). We thereafter applied two machine learning (ML) techniques, support vector machine (SVM) and neural network (NN), and compared the differences in the ability to predict the combined toxicity by means of the ML-based methods and two component-based mixture models: independent action and concentration addition. Among 72 developed quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models by the ML methods, two SVM-QSAR models and two NN-QSAR models showed good performance. Moreover, an NN-based QSAR model combined with two molecular descriptors, namely enthalpy of formation of a gaseous cation and metal oxide standard molar enthalpy of formation, showed the best predictive power for the internal dataset (R<sup>2</sup><sub>test</sub> = 0.911, adjusted R<sup>2</sup><sub>test</sub> = 0.733, RMSE<sub>test</sub> = 0.091, and MAE<sub>test</sub> = 0.067) and for the combination of internal and external datasets (R<sup>2</sup><sub>test</sub> = 0.908, adjusted R<sup>2</sup><sub>test</sub> = 0.871, RMSE<sub>test</sub> = 0.255, and MAE<sub>test</sub> = 0.181). In addition, the developed QSAR models performed better than the component-based models. The estimation of the applicability domain of the selected QSAR models showed that all the binary mixtures in training and test sets were in the applicability domain. This study approach could provide a methodological and theoretical basis for the ecological risk assessment of mixtures of ENPs.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper