0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Human Health Effects Sign in to save

Acute toxicity assessment of nine organic UV filters using a set of biotests

Toxicological Research 2023 31 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 60 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Marcin Stec, Aleksander Astel

Summary

Researchers tested the acute toxicity of nine UV-filtering chemicals found in sunscreens and personal care products on four aquatic species — including brine shrimp, water fleas, marine bacteria, and freshwater plants — finding all nine were acutely toxic, with octocrylene posing the greatest risk to animal life. When tested as mixtures, some combinations showed reduced combined toxicity, but a binary mix of benzophenone-2 with octocrylene or homosalate was highly toxic to marine bacteria.

Abstract UV filters in environmental compartments are a source of concern related to their ecotoxicological effects. However, little is known about UV filters’ toxicity, particularly those released into the environment as mixtures. Acute toxicity of nine organic UV filters benzophenone-1, benzophenone-2, benzophenone-3, 4-methoxy benzylidene camphor, octocrylene, ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate, 2-ethylhexyl salicylate, homosalate, and butyl methoxydibenzoylmethane was determined. UV filter solutions were tested as single, binary, and ternary mixtures of various compositions. Single solutions were tested using a set of bio tests, including tests on saline crustaceans ( Artemia franciscana ), freshwater crustaceans ( Daphnia magna ), marine bacteria ( Aliivibrio fischeri ), and freshwater plants ( Lemna minor ). The tests represent different stages of the trophic chain, and hence their overall results could be used to risk assessment concerning various water reservoirs. The toxicity of binary and ternary mixtures was analyzed using the standardized Microtox ® method. Generally, organic UV filters were classified as acutely toxic. Octocrylene was the most toxic for Arthemia franciscana (LC 50 = 0.55 mg L –1 ) and Daphnia magna (EC 50 = 2.66–3.67 mg L –1 ). The most toxic against freshwater plants were homosalate (IC 50 = 1.46 mg L –1 ) and octocrylene (IC 50 = 1.95 mg L –1 ). Ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate (EC 50 = 1.38–2.16 mg L –1 ) was the most toxic for marine bacteria. The least toxic for crustaceans and plants were benzophenone-1 (EC 50 = 6.15–46.78 mg L –1 ) and benzophenone-2 (EC 50 = 14.15–54.30 mg L –1 ), while 4-methoxy benzylidene camphor was the least toxic for marine bacteria (EC 50 = 12.97–15.44 mg L –1 ). Individual species differ in their sensitivity to the tested organic UV filters. An assessment of the toxicity of mixtures indicates high and acute toxicity to marine bacteria after exposition to a binary mixture of benzophenone-2 with octocrylene, 2-ethylhexyl salicylate, or homosalate. The toxicity of mixtures was lower than single solutions predicting antagonistic interaction between chemicals. Graphical abstract

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Do Single-Component and Mixtures Selected Organic UV Filters Induce Embryotoxic Effects in Zebrafish (Danio rerio)?

Researchers tested five organic UV filters commonly found in sunscreens for embryotoxicity in zebrafish, finding that certain compounds like octocrylene and benzophenone-3 caused significant developmental effects both individually and in mixtures.

Article Tier 2

UV-filter pollution: current concerns and future prospects.

This review examines how UV-filter chemicals from sunscreens and industrial products enter aquatic environments and what their ecological effects are. UV-filters are also used as additives in plastics, making their environmental release relevant to the broader chemical pollution associated with plastic waste.

Article Tier 2

UV filters in everyday cosmetic products, a comparative study

This study surveyed UV-filtering chemicals across 742 cosmetic products and found widespread presence in everyday personal care items. UV filters are increasingly detected as environmental and biological contaminants, reaching waterways through skin absorption and washing, where they can interact with microplastics and other pollutants.

Article Tier 2

Cytotoxicity of BP-3 and BP-4: Blockage of extrusion pumps, oxidative damage and programmed cell death on Chlamydomonas reinhardtii

Researchers exposed a common freshwater microalga to two sunscreen chemicals — benzophenone-3 and benzophenone-4 — and found both triggered cell damage, blocked the alga's defense pumps, and induced programmed cell death, with BP-3 causing more harm. Since these UV-filter chemicals wash into waterways, the findings raise concern about their threat to aquatic plant life.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics enhance the toxicity and phototoxicity of UV filter avobenzone on Daphnia magna

Polystyrene microplastics (200 nm) were found to enhance the toxicity and phototoxicity of the UV filter avobenzone to aquatic organisms, with the combination causing greater harm than either pollutant alone. The results raise regulatory concern about co-occurring microplastic and UV filter pollution in sunscreen-impacted coastal waters.

Share this paper