We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Single and multispecies microalgae toxicological tests assessing the impact of several BPA analogues used by industry
Summary
Researchers tested five BPA chemical analogues (intended as safer BPA replacements) on three marine microalgae species, finding that several analogues — particularly BPFL and BPAF — were more toxic than BPA itself and that results from single-species tests did not reliably predict community-level outcomes, raising concerns about the safety of current BPA substitutes.
BPA is a hazard for human and environmental health and recently BPA was added to the Candidate List of substances of very high concern by European Chemical Agency (ECHA). In accordance with this proposal, the authorities have encouraged the replacement of BPA by BPA analogues; however, little is known about the impact of these compounds on the environment. Due to this situation five BPA analogues (BPS, BPAP, BPAF, BPFL and BPC) were chosen in order to study their effects on marine primary producers. Three marine microalgae species (Phaeodactylum tricornutum, Tetraselmis suecica and Nannochloropsis gaditana) were selected for single and multispecies tests concerning the ecotoxicological effects of these BPA analogues. Microalgae were exposed to BPs over 72 h at different dosages (5, 20, 40, 80, 150 and 300 μM). Responses such as: growth, ROS production, cell complexity, cell size, autofluorescence of chlorophyll a, effective quantum yield of PSII and pigment concentrations were assessed at 24, 48 and 72 h. The results revealed that BPS and BPA showed lower toxicity to microalgae in comparison with BPFL > BPAF > BPAP and >BPC for the endpoints studied. N. gaditana was the least sensitive microalgae in comparison to P. tricornutum and T. suecica. However, a different trend was found in the multispecies tests where T. suecica dominated the microalgae community in relation to N. gaditana and P. tricornutum. The results of this work revealed for first time that present day BPA analogues are a threat and not a safe substitute for BPA in terms of the marine phytoplanktonic community. Therefore, the results of their impact on aquatic organisms should be shared.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Can BPA Analogs Affect Cellular and Biochemical Responses in the Microalga Phaeodactylum tricornutum Bohlin?
Researchers tested three bisphenol A analogs (BPAF, BPF, BPS) and their mixture on the marine diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum at environmentally relevant concentrations of 300 ng/L, measuring growth, cell size, and oxidative stress biomarkers. All three analogs and their mixture affected the microalga, raising concerns about the ecological risks of BPA substitutes in marine environments.
Can BPA Analogs Affect Cellular and Biochemical Responses in the Microalga Phaeodactylum tricornutum Bohlin?
This study tested three bisphenol A replacement chemicals (BPAF, BPF, and BPS) on a marine diatom at environmentally relevant concentrations, finding that all three disrupted algal growth and triggered oxidative stress. Although no actual cell damage was detected at these doses, the results suggest that BPA substitutes are not chemically inert and may still threaten marine primary producers. This is relevant to microplastics research because these bisphenol chemicals leach from plastics and are released alongside microplastic particles in the environment.
Insights into the Adverse Effects of Bisphenol A on the Environment and Human Health
Researchers investigated the toxicity of bisphenol A (BPA), its replacement bisphenol F (BPF), and their combination on primary producers, finding that both compounds harm eukaryotic green algae and raising concerns about the safety of BPA substitutes.
Toxicity of bisphenol A and its structural congeners to microalgae Chlorella vulgaris and Desmodesmus armatus
Researchers examined the toxicity of bisphenol A and six structural congeners on two microalgae species, finding varying levels of growth inhibition and highlighting that some BPA alternatives may pose comparable or greater risks to aquatic primary producers.
Ecotoxicological effects and bioaccumulation of BPA analogues and their mixture in the clam Ruditapes philippinarum
Researchers exposed clams to three common bisphenol A substitutes (BPAF, BPF, and BPS) at environmentally relevant concentrations to evaluate whether these replacement chemicals are truly safer. The study found that all three BPA analogues caused oxidative stress, cellular damage, and neurotoxic effects in clam tissues, suggesting that these widely used substitutes may pose similar ecological risks as the compound they were designed to replace.