0
Systematic Review ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 1 ? Systematic review or meta-analysis. Synthesizes findings across many studies. Strongest evidence. Food & Water Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

Biodegradability of bioplastics in different aquatic environments: A systematic review

Journal of Environmental Sciences 2023 62 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 65 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Maria Cristina Lavagnolo Valentina Grossule, Valentina Grossule, Maria Cristina Lavagnolo Valentina Grossule, Valentina Grossule, Maria Cristina Lavagnolo Valentina Poli, Anna Maria Zampini, Maria Cristina Lavagnolo Valentina Poli, Anna Maria Zampini, Maria Cristina Lavagnolo Maria Cristina Lavagnolo Valentina Grossule, Maria Cristina Lavagnolo Maria Cristina Lavagnolo Maria Cristina Lavagnolo Maria Cristina Lavagnolo Maria Cristina Lavagnolo

Summary

This systematic review examines whether bioplastics actually break down in water as promised. The findings reveal wide variability in how well different bioplastics biodegrade in freshwater and saltwater, and current testing standards lack clear targets, meaning some materials marketed as biodegradable may still persist in the environment and contribute to microplastic pollution.

Study Type Review

Bioplastics were first introduced as environmentally friendly materials, with properties similar to those of conventional plastics. A bioplastic is defined as biodegradable if it can be decomposed into carbon dioxide under aerobic degradation, or methane and CO<sub>2</sub> under anaerobic conditions, inorganic compounds, and new cellular biomass, by the action of naturally occurring microorganisms. This definition however does not provide any information on the environmental conditions, timescale and extent at which decomposition processes should occur. With regard to the aquatic environment, recognized standards have been established to assess the ability of plastics to undergo biodegradation; however, these standards fail to provide clear targets to be met to allow labelling of a bioplastic as biodegradable. Moreover, these standards grant the user an extensive leeway in the choice of process parameters. For these reasons, the comparison of results deriving from different studies is challenging. The authors analysed and discussed the degree of biodegradability of a series of biodegradable bioplastics in aquatic environments (both fresh and salt water) using the results obtained in the laboratory and from on-site testing in the context of different research studies. Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD), CO<sub>2</sub> evolution, surface erosion and weight loss were the main parameters used by researchers to describe the percentage of biodegradation. The results showed a large variability both in weight loss and BOD, even when evaluating the same type of bioplastics. This confirms the need for a reference range of values to be established with regard to parameters applied in defining the biodegradability of bioplastics.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper