0
Article Tier 2 Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Towards a rational and efficient risk assessment for microplastics

TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 2023 45 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

This study compared two existing risk assessment frameworks for microplastics, clarifying key terminology differences and providing a shortlist of crucial elements that risk managers should consider for rational and efficient microplastic risk evaluation.

To avoid confusion about the risks of microplastics in the public domain, it is crucial that differences in terminology and approach within existing risk assessment frameworks are clear to risk managers. In this article, we discuss key concepts and recent literature on the risk assessment of microplastics and provide a shortlist of crucial elements to consider. Furthermore, we compare and contrast two approaches that have been published but have not yet been compared in detail. One method uses categories of particle properties, does not include an impact assessment, and is limited to the risk of particles in a sample. The other method uses continuums of particle properties, incorporates biological properties into an impact assessment, and focuses on the risk of all particles in the system. We discuss both approaches in light of existing disciplinary scientific knowledge, risk assessment science, and their relevance to risk managers.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Paradigms to assess the human health risks of nano- and microplastics

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers proposed a new, comprehensive framework for assessing the health risks of nano- and microplastics (tiny plastic particles), addressing key gaps in how we analyze these particles, model their behavior, and use that information to protect human health — since no such standard risk assessment system currently exists.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics: addressing ecological risk through lessons learned

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers reviewed the current state of microplastic ecological risk assessment and proposed applying lessons learned from more established fields of environmental research. The study suggests that despite widespread concern about microplastic pollution, scientific understanding of actual ecological risk remains limited, and future research should follow more rigorous risk assessment frameworks.

Article Tier 2

Assessment of potential ecological risk for microplastic particles

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers developed a framework for assessing the ecological risk of microplastic particles, incorporating particle characteristics, environmental concentrations, and species sensitivity data. The assessment identified conditions under which current environmental microplastic levels pose significant risk to aquatic organisms.

Article Tier 2

Towards a risk assessment framework for micro- and nanoplastic particles for human health

AI summary Read the abstract

This review proposes a framework for assessing the health risks of micro- and nanoplastics to humans, noting that current methods are inadequate because these particles come in countless types, sizes, and chemical compositions. The authors recommend focusing first on inhalation risks and suggest using existing approaches for evaluating low-toxicity particles and fibers as a starting point for plastic particle safety standards.

Article Tier 2

How problems with microplastics in research and application can be overcome

AI summary Read the abstract

This methodological review addressed common problems in micro- and nanoplastic research, including challenges in hazard identification, exposure assessment, and risk characterization arising from the complex mixture nature of MNPs. The authors proposed practical solutions and standardization approaches to improve the reliability of microplastic risk assessments.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper