0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Towards a rational and efficient risk assessment for microplastics

TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 2023 45 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Albert A. Koelmans, Berte M. Gebreyohanes Belay, Svenja M. Mintenig, Nur Hazimah Mohamed Nor, Paula E. Redondo‐Hasselerharm, Vera N. de Ruijter

Summary

This study compared two existing risk assessment frameworks for microplastics, clarifying key terminology differences and providing a shortlist of crucial elements that risk managers should consider for rational and efficient microplastic risk evaluation.

To avoid confusion about the risks of microplastics in the public domain, it is crucial that differences in terminology and approach within existing risk assessment frameworks are clear to risk managers. In this article, we discuss key concepts and recent literature on the risk assessment of microplastics and provide a shortlist of crucial elements to consider. Furthermore, we compare and contrast two approaches that have been published but have not yet been compared in detail. One method uses categories of particle properties, does not include an impact assessment, and is limited to the risk of particles in a sample. The other method uses continuums of particle properties, incorporates biological properties into an impact assessment, and focuses on the risk of all particles in the system. We discuss both approaches in light of existing disciplinary scientific knowledge, risk assessment science, and their relevance to risk managers.

Share this paper