0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Sign in to save

Development of automated microplastic identification workflow for Raman micro-imaging and evaluation of the uncertainties during micro-imaging

Marine Pollution Bulletin 2023 19 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 45 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Zijiang Yang, Zijiang Yang, Zijiang Yang, Zijiang Yang, Zijiang Yang, Hiroya Nagashima, Hisayuki Arakawa Hisayuki Arakawa Hisayuki Arakawa Hisayuki Arakawa Hisayuki Arakawa Hisayuki Arakawa Hisayuki Arakawa Hisayuki Arakawa Hisayuki Arakawa Hisayuki Arakawa Hisayuki Arakawa Hisayuki Arakawa Hisayuki Arakawa Hiroya Nagashima, Hiroya Nagashima, Hiroya Nagashima, Zijiang Yang, Hiroya Nagashima, Hiroya Nagashima, Hisayuki Arakawa Hisayuki Arakawa Zijiang Yang, Hisayuki Arakawa Hisayuki Arakawa Hisayuki Arakawa Hisayuki Arakawa Hisayuki Arakawa Hisayuki Arakawa Hisayuki Arakawa Hisayuki Arakawa Hisayuki Arakawa Hisayuki Arakawa Hisayuki Arakawa Hisayuki Arakawa Hisayuki Arakawa Hisayuki Arakawa Hisayuki Arakawa Hisayuki Arakawa Hisayuki Arakawa Hisayuki Arakawa Hisayuki Arakawa Hisayuki Arakawa Hisayuki Arakawa Hisayuki Arakawa Hisayuki Arakawa Hisayuki Arakawa Hisayuki Arakawa

Summary

Researchers developed an automated identification workflow for Raman micro-imaging of microplastics, validating it with artificial samples of known polymer microspheres and showing that the workflow reliably identifies plastic type and estimates particle size across a range of sizes.

In this study, an automated identification workflow for Raman micro-imaging (RMI) was developed, and the performance was evaluated by artificial samples of microplastic (MP) microsphere with different sizes and types. Theoretical detection rate and estimated particle size were derived and compared with experimental data. Results show that the proposed workflow can identify plastic types and estimate the size of the MP microspheres under different conditions for most cases. However, size of laser spot and discrepancy between sample surface and focal plane can influence RMI results in two ways. Firstly, small particles are more likely to be detected. Secondly, estimated sizes of particles are more likely to be overestimated. The derived uncertainties can serve as a reference for future experimental design and further investigation of more complex situations. The workflow is accessible online, and interested researchers can adjust the parameter values as necessary to suit their specific circumstances.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper