0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

Leveraging the bioeconomy for carbon drawdown

2023 Score: 30 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
John Dees, William Joe Sagues, Ethan Woods, Hannah Goldsein, A. J. Simon, Daniel L. Sanchez

Summary

This paper reviews strategies for large-scale carbon dioxide removal from the atmosphere, including bioenergy with carbon capture. The discussion is relevant to understanding how sustainable materials and reduced plastic production fit into broader climate change mitigation strategies.

Stringent climate change mitigation scenarios rely on large-scale drawdown of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Amongst drawdown technologies, bioenergy with carbon capture and sequestration (BECCS) has received considerable attention in the climate mitigation literature. Recently, attention has shifted further from a relatively narrow focus on BECCS to a broader focus on Biomass Carbon Removal and Storage (BiCRS). The concept of BiCRS has the potential to enable a future where the climate mitigation value of biomass resources is more valuable than the energy value, due to the potential to remove and sequester large quantities atmospheric CO2. This article provides a qualitative overview of prominent BiCRS technologies from which a set of the most promising technologies are assessed quantitively through life cycle assessment. There are numerous opportunities to incorporate carbon removal and management within the bioeconomy, but the majority of immediate carbon removal potential exists in four bioproducts: bioenergy, bioplastics, biochar, and wood products. We analyze the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and disposition of sequestered carbon over 10,000 years for four bioproducts representative of each broader category: an advanced BECCS pathway, biopolyethylene, oriented strand board, and biochar soil amendment. We find that the BECCS pathway has the greatest magnitude and durability of CO2 storage over all time horizons. However, non-BECCS pathways achieve 34–64% of the drawdown magnitude relative to BECCS and retain 55–67% of their initial drawdown over 100 years (central estimate). We identify three engineering strategies for enhancing carbon drawdown: reducing biomass supply chain emissions, maximizing carbon stored in long lived products, and extending the term of carbon storage. Finally, we highlight the need to characterize both the magnitude and permanence of carbon drawdown as a means for policymakers and technology develo pers to deploy limited biomass resources to maximize mitigation benefits.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Leveraging the bioeconomy for carbon drawdown

This review analyzed opportunities for leveraging the bioeconomy for long-term carbon dioxide removal and storage in biomass-derived products, assessing strategies for carbon drawdown through sustainable bio-based materials.

Article Tier 2

Recent Advances in Polymeric Systems for CO2 Capture: A Small Catalogue

This review surveys advances in polymer-based materials for capturing carbon dioxide as part of climate change mitigation. Polymer science advances relevant to CO2 capture are also applicable to developing materials that can remove microplastics from water and air.

Article Tier 2

Role of biochar toward carbon neutrality

This review examines how biochar, a carbon-rich material made from plant waste, can help fight climate change by reducing greenhouse gas emissions across agriculture, energy, and construction. While not directly about microplastics, biochar is also used as an environmental cleanup tool that can adsorb pollutants from soil and water, including plastic particles.

Article Tier 2

Sustainability Through Bio-Agriculture: Carbon Dioxide Reduction (CDR) Plus Biodiversity Recovery

This paper is not directly about microplastics; it examines sustainable bio-agriculture as a carbon dioxide reduction strategy and biodiversity recovery approach, mentioning microplastics only peripherally in broader environmental discussions.

Article Tier 2

Sustainability Through Bio-Agriculture: Carbon Dioxide Reduction (CDR) Plus Biodiversity Recovery

Researchers examined bio-agriculture approaches for simultaneous carbon dioxide reduction and biodiversity recovery, arguing that technological carbon capture strategies often overlook the parallel biodiversity crisis and proposing integrated agricultural solutions.

Share this paper