We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
What can we learn from biodegradation of natural polymers for regulation?
Summary
This study examined biodegradation patterns of natural polymers and found that many would be classified as persistent under current regulatory frameworks, arguing that mineralization alone is insufficient for assessing synthetic polymer persistence and that environmental risk assessment needs refinement.
Abstract Synthetic polymers are chemicals of emerging concern for the environment, which is mainly attributed to their persistence in environmental compartments. On the other hand, polymers exist in nature as well. They are regarded of no concern for the environment. The present article focusses on the environmental fate of natural polymers and the implications on the persistence assessment for synthetic polymers. Natural polymers vary widely in structure, function, and properties. Crystallinity, wettability and surface area are important influencing factors on the (bio)degradation kinetics. Chemical and enzymatic hydrolysis is the most important process for the degradation of natural polymers, which for particulate material takes place either by bulk or surface erosion. Some natural polymers are degraded rapidly, but in other cases, degradation of natural polymers takes very long until complete mineralization. These differences in biodegradability are a result of evolution as they have to fulfil specific functions in nature which might require a certain persistency. Consequently, many natural polymers would have to be considered persistent or very persistent (P or vP) based on the available studies using the standard assessment approach. At the same time, they are considered no concern to the environment for good reasons. The analysis emphasizes that mineralization alone is not a resilient persistence endpoint for polymers. This needs to be recognized when assessing synthetic polymers, many of which would fulfil the existing P/vP criteria as well. For such synthetic polymers, it would be important to establish meaningful endpoints and polymer specific criteria to enable an adequate persistence assessment using a weight-of-evidence approach.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Hazardous state lifetimes of biodegradable plastics in natural environments
Researchers proposed a framework for assessing how long biodegradable plastics remain in hazardous transition states like microplastics and nanoplastics before fully mineralizing, finding that these intermediate states can persist for extended periods even for supposedly biodegradable materials.
Toward a Framework for Environmental Fate and Exposure Assessment of Polymers
This review discusses challenges and opportunities for developing environmental fate and exposure assessment frameworks for polymers in regulatory risk assessment, finding that the diversity and complexity of polymers requires adaptation of existing chemical assessment approaches.
The effect of biodegradable plastics on microplastic accumulation and exposure
Researchers developed a comprehensive method to quantify microplastic accumulation from biodegradable polymers in natural environments, examining whether biodegradable alternatives actually reduce plastic loads compared to conventional polymers under real-world outdoor conditions.
Why is high persistence alone a major cause of concern?
This paper argues that persistence alone — the ability of a chemical to resist degradation in the environment — should be treated as a major hazard concern in chemical regulation, even without established toxicity data. The argument is directly relevant to microplastics, which are highly persistent and accumulate in ecosystems over time.
Predictive modelling to assess the accumulation of biodegradable and non-biodegradable microplastics in the natural environment.
Researchers developed predictive models to assess the accumulation of both biodegradable and non-biodegradable microplastics in natural environments, addressing the lack of a comprehensive methodology for quantifying MP buildup and enabling comparisons of environmental impact across polymer types.