0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Toxicogenomic analysis of the carcinogenic potential of plastic additives

2023 3 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Sophia Vincoff, Beatrice Schleupner, Jasmine Santos, Margaret Morrison, Newland Zhang, Meagan M. Dunphy‐Daly, William C. Eward, Andrew J. Armstrong, Zoie Diana, Jason A. Somarelli

Summary

Researchers performed a toxicogenomic analysis of 2,712 plastic additives across chemical databases, finding that over 150 have known carcinogenicity while roughly 90% lack any cancer-related safety data, and that both carcinogenic and unstudied additives share biological pathways involving DNA damage and immune disruption.

Body Systems

Abstract Plastics are the most prevalent human-made substance in the world and are ubiquitous throughout all ecosystems. Microscopic plastic particles are routinely ingested and inhaled by humans and other organisms. Despite the frequency of plastic exposures, little is known about their health consequences. Of particular concern are plastic additives -chemical compounds that are mixed into plastics to improve functionality or are unintentionally acquired during plastic production and use. Additives are loosely bound to the plastic polymer and may be released during plastic exposures. These compounds may pose health concerns, such as cancer, but little is known about the potential impact of these chemicals on health. To better understand the health effects of plastic additives, we performed an integrated toxicogenomic analysis on 2,712 additives, focusing on cancer as a well-studied toxicological endpoint. Screening these substances across three chemical databases revealed two key observations: 1) over 150 plastic additives have known carcinogenicity and 2) the majority (∼90%) of plastic additives lack data on carcinogenic endpoints. Analyses of additive usage patterns pinpointed specific polymers, functions, and products in which carcinogenic additives reside. Based on published chemical-gene interactions, both carcinogenic additives and additives with unknown carcinogenicity impacted similar biological pathways. The predominant pathways involved DNA damage, apoptosis, immune response, viral diseases, and cancer. This study underscores the urgent need for systematic and comprehensive carcinogenicity assessment of plastic additives and regulatory responses to mitigate the potential health risks of plastic exposure.

Share this paper