0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Measuring historical pollution: natural history collections as tools for public health and environmental justice research

2023 2 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Shane G. DuBay, Brian Weeks, Pamela Davis‐Kean, Carl Fuldner, Nyeema C. Harris, Sara Hughes, Bruce K. O'Brien, Marie Perkins, Cheryl Weyant

Summary

This review argues that biological specimens held in natural history museum collections — such as preserved birds, fish, and insects — represent an underutilized archive of quantitative pollution data spanning nearly two centuries. By linking historical specimen data to health outcomes in affected communities, researchers could better understand the long-term consequences of emerging contaminants like microplastics and support environmental justice policy.

Background: Through the industrial era, environmental pollution has been unevenly distributed in the environment, disproportionately impacting disenfranchised communities. The distribution of pollution is thus a question of environmental justice and public health that requires policy solutions. However, we lack robust quantitative data on pollutants for many locations and time periods because environmental monitoring is largely reactive—i.e., pollutants are monitored only after they are recognized as harmful and circulating in the environment at elevated levels. Without comprehensive historical pollution data, it is difficult to understand the full, intergenerational determinants and consequences of pollutants on environmental and human health. Here, we promote the use of biological specimens in natural history collections as an underutilized source of quantitative pollution data for tracking environmental change over nearly two centuries and for informing justice-centered policy solutions. Objectives:First, we discuss the need for quantitative pollution data in environmental research and its implications for public health and policy. We then examine the capacity of biological specimens to serve as tools for tracking environmental pollutants through space and time. We then present a framework for how pollution datasets from specimens can be paired with spatially and temporally matched human health datasets to inform and evaluate public policy. Finally, we identify challenges and research directions associated with the use of quantitative pollution datasets.Discussion:Biological specimens present a unique opportunity to fill critical gaps in the environmental record—and to generate historical data for emerging pollutants—to engage public health and policy questions that we have previously lacked data to address. This work demands diverse expertise and partnerships across the sciences, and between researchers and communities affected by pollution, to connect data generated from specimens with urgent questions about environmental health and justice, and to find solutions to some of the most pressing environmental challenges of the twenty-first century.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

The role of museum of biological collections in environmental research: a short note

Museum biological collections — preserved specimens gathered over decades — provide a unique way to track how chemical contaminants like microplastics and heavy metals have changed in ecosystems over time. Comparing historical and modern specimens allows researchers to identify long-term pollution trends that would be impossible to detect through contemporary sampling alone.

Article Tier 2

Can natural history collection specimens be used as aquatic microplastic pollution bioindicators?

Researchers explored whether preserved animal specimens from natural history museum collections could serve as historical records of microplastic pollution over time. By reviewing how such collections have been used to track other pollutants, they identified key challenges — including inconsistent sampling and specimen degradation — and proposed guidelines for using museum archives to reconstruct how microplastic contamination has changed over decades.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics in Museums: Pollution and Paleoecology

This study investigated microplastic contamination in museum natural history collections, assessing both the pollution risk to preserved specimens and the potential for using archived samples to study historical microplastic accumulation in ecosystems.

Article Tier 2

Review of microplastics in museum specimens: An under-utilized tool to better understand the Plasticene

A review of microplastic studies using museum collection specimens spanning 1900-2019 found that archived marine and freshwater organisms can fill knowledge gaps on historical microplastic pollution trends, with microfibers as the most common type found across all specimen types reviewed.

Article Tier 2

Surrounded by microplastic, since when? Testing the feasibility of exploring past levels of plastic microfibre pollution using natural history museum collections

Microplastic fibers were found in over half of marine sponge specimens collected more than 20 years ago and preserved in a museum collection. This retrospective finding confirms that microplastic fiber pollution in the ocean predates recent awareness, providing a historical baseline for tracking contamination over time.

Share this paper